Category: Ultra Running

  • Calculated Pacing: An Interview With Sarah Webster on Her 24-Hour World Record

    Calculated Pacing: An Interview With Sarah Webster on Her 24-Hour World Record

    The post Calculated Pacing: An Interview With Sarah Webster on Her 24-Hour World Record appeared first on iRunFar.

    When Great Britain’s Sarah Webster surpassed the women’s 24-hour world record at the 2025 IAU 24-Hour World Championships in Albi, France, on October 19, she still had a full hour left to race and add mileage to the previous mark. She would end up running 278.622 kilometers (173.127 miles), breaking the previous record held by Japan’s Miho Nakata by 8.259 kilometers (5.131 miles), set in 2023.

    In only her second 24-hour race ever, Webster executed exceptional pacing throughout the event. Averaging 5:11 minutes per kilometer (8:19 minutes per mile), including any breaks needed over the 24-hour period, her pace remained incredibly consistent throughout the event, only slowing in the final hours. As she describes in the following interview, it was all part of her plan.

    Webster, who is 46 years old and not a professional runner, was third at both the 2024 IAU 100k World Championships and the 2023 IAU 50k World Championships. She qualified to represent Great Britain at this year’s 24-hour world championships by running 243.393 kilometers (151.237 miles) in 24 hours at the qualifying event this past April, and had to work her training around a dislocated shoulder leading up to the event.

    Learn more about how her race played out in this transcribed interview, and read our 2025 IAU 24-Hour World Championships results article and our news article about her world record to learn more about this year’s race and Sarah’s performance.

    Sarah Webster - 2025 IAU 24-Hour World Championships - running
    Sarah during the 2025 IAU 24-Hour World Championships. Photo: John O’Regan

    [Editor’s Note: This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.]

    iRunFar: Congratulations. What an enormous thing that you’ve just done. How do you feel?

    Sarah Webster: I don’t think it’s quite sunk in. Yeah, just feeling very tired generally. And obviously, legs are still a little bit sore. But yeah, I can’t quite get my head around it all.

    iRunFar: I imagine it’ll take a while. How’s your body feeling?

    Webster: Better today. I can now sit down and stand up without thinking too hard about it, so that’s good. But getting down on the floor and getting back up again is still quite hard.

    iRunFar: Before we talk about the race, I just wanted to ask a bit about your history with running, where you started out, and what brought you to doing the 24 hours now?

    Webster: I ran as a junior, just did club running, mostly track, cross country, because I had to. I did the very occasional road race, but mostly on the track. Then I gave it all up in my final year at university and concentrated on getting my degree. I didn’t go back to running until my daughter was four and she was going to school, and I had time on my hands. My husband was like, “I think you should start running again.” I was like, “Really? You really don’t know what you are asking.” He’s like, “No, it’s fine. I’ll support you.” And yeah, he had no idea what it was going to involve. I did a half marathon, and then I was like, “Oh, actually, I think I’ll go back and do some track.” So I did some track and I represented the Isle of Man in the Ireland Games in the 1,500 and 5,000 meters.

    Then I was like, “No, this is too hard. I can’t do this anymore. I’m getting too old.” I went back on the road, did some more half marathons, then I moved up to a marathon, and that was really good. Really started enjoying doing marathons. And then somebody posted, “Oh, the standard for getting a GB [Team Great Britain] vest for the IAU 50k World Championships, you only have to have run a marathon.” And it was 2:45, which is what I had. I was like, “Oh wow, a GB vest. That would be a dream come true.” I didn’t get it then, there were better runners ahead of me, but the fact that I could was what started me thinking about it.

    Then everything got a bit delayed because COVID-19 hit. And then I was trying to qualify for the Commonwealth Games Marathon for the Isle of Man, so that delayed the process. Otherwise, I probably would’ve done a 50k sooner. But then I saw that I could get an England vest with my marathon time for the 100k. So I naively applied for 100k place on the England team, and naively informed them that I was going to try and break the British record, and actually exceeded my expectations of the race, and decided that 100ks were quite good fun. I had to do a 50k fairly soon after that, because I had to qualify if I wanted a GB vest for the IAU 50k World Championships, which I managed to do.

    So yeah, 50k and then back up to the 100k. I looked at the plan, and the IAU 50k World Championships was back in India. And having run twice in India, France definitely had more appeal. So I thought, “Well, I’ll try and qualify for the IAU 24-Hour World Championships, and if I don’t or I don’t enjoy it, it doesn’t matter, I can go back and try and qualify for the 50k.” So then having qualified for 24 hours, it was like, “Oh, now you’ve got to actually run the championships.”

    Sarah Webster running collage
    Left: Sarah running at the 50k world champs 2023. Photo: Archie Jenkins
    Right: Sarah at a local Isle of Man race a few years ago. Photo courtesy of Sarah Webster.

    iRunFar: And that was just this year, wasn’t it? Your first-ever 24-hour race. And at that point, you broke the British record?

    Webster: Yeah. Well, broke the British track record. The overall record, Britain distinguishes between track and road. So I didn’t have the road one until Albi, but I broke the British track record, which yeah, that was the aim, and that included walking for four hours. I was utterly determined that I could do better this time.

    iRunFar: I suppose with the experience, you were able to plan differently, plan better.

    Webster: Yeah. I mean, the aim for the qualifying race was just to still be running after 24 hours. I’d basically still be out on the track unless I was unconscious or the medics had pulled me off. It was an absolute determination just to finish the race. And then this time it was like, “Ok, that’s fine, but that’s not good enough for the championships. You’re going to have to run the race now.” So yeah, that was the sole aim was just to basically run pretty much the whole time.

    iRunFar: And just to check in, so your marathon, did you compete in the Commonwealth Games?

    Webster: I did. I had a very bad run. I had COVID-19 about two weeks before, and I was still testing positive two days before the race. So yeah, it was an absolute nightmare, slowest marathon I’ve done. So yes, I’ve got unfinished business with the Commonwealth Games, but I’ll never have to go back there because obviously they don’t have one. And now, because I don’t live on the Isle of Man, I won’t be able to represent them anymore, unfortunately.

    iRunFar: That was 2022.

    Webster: Yeah.

    iRunFar: So going properly onto your race now, what was going through your head? Did you separate the race into different phases? Did you have a change of mindset throughout?

    Webster: Yeah, the first four hours were pretty horrible. It was like, “Oh God, this is going so slowly. How could I be this knackered while I’m running this slowly?” And then after four hours, it kind of just slipped into place. I got into a rhythm. The rest of the day and night, that was fine. I just carried on going round, and then the last three or four hours were really, really hard. But by that point, I knew all I had to do was keep going even slower than I was already doing, but certainly at the pace I was doing, and I was going to do it.

    Sarah Webster - 2025 IAU 24-Hour World Championships - women's champion running
    Sarah Webster on her final lap at the 2025 IAU 24-Hour World Championships. Photo: iRunFar/Deki Fourcin

    iRunFar: At what point did you realize that the world record was going to be obtainable?

    Webster: I think it was with about three hours to go, because I kept trying to work out the laps, and I was thinking, “Well, I’ve got 30k to do, and so long as I keep running at 10k an hour,” which was slower than what I was doing, it was fine. I was going to do it. Then I was more worried that the other two girls were going to catch me because I knew full well they potentially would come through a lot faster in their last few hours. That was more the worry of, yes, I could get the record, but were they going to catch me? I knew after I’d got the record, I couldn’t afford to stop because they were going to catch me. And they were catching me at the end. They were doing very well.

    iRunFar: I was standing there just at the point where you came through when there were the announcements, “Ok, next time we see Sarah, she’s going to have beaten the world record.” And I saw you come through, and the whole team, they were so excited, they were there waiting for you.

    Webster: They were amazing. Really, really amazing support from everybody. It was absolutely incredible. I couldn’t have done it without them.

    iRunFar: I thought maybe you’d slow down, stop for a minute, but you looked so determined, you grabbed the flag and went.

    Webster: Thank you. Yeah, I couldn’t put it around me. I dislocated my shoulder six weeks ago, so any movement in my shoulder beyond the basics, that’s why I wasn’t wearing a neck bandana or anything to keep me cool, because I just couldn’t put it around my neck and move my arm properly. So I just had to carry the flag.

    iRunFar: Did you have a strategy beforehand that you put in place during the race?

    Webster: The idea was I absolutely was not allowed to go off any faster than roughly 7:30 per lap, which worked out at eight-minute mile-ing or five minutes per kilometer. If it was any faster than that for more than a lap, then my team had to tell me to slow down because I knew if I kept that pace up, there was a chance that I would break the world record. Whereas if I went out faster than that, I wasn’t going to break it, I’d have blown up. That was the aim. Didn’t mind if I went slower than that, I just wasn’t allowed to go any faster than that until four hours to go. I hoped I’d have something left for four hours to go and go faster. But no, that was the consistency. Then the idea was just to have a break every four, roughly four to five hours and have a reset, which should have involved me doing some squats, with the team holding me.

    iRunFar: I saw that at the end.

    Webster: Yeah. That worked really well until about the last hour. Then I was pretty much doing them every lap because I knew my crew weren’t going to allow me to sit down, so it was like, you’re going to have to support me while I do these squats because at least my legs are in a different position, and then yeah, you give me a kick and get me going again. It seemed to help, because my quads were just screaming for the last three, four hours.

    My team wanted me to speed up with about three hours to go. I think they wanted me to break the outright British record, but I realized by that point, I was so dizzy and my legs were so knackered that if I’d fallen and re-dislocated my shoulder, the race was going to be over. I couldn’t. So it was like, I can’t actually speed up. I’m just going to have to just keep going at this pace. There’s nothing I can do because to fall and to lose the race because I’d fallen would’ve just been absolutely gutting.

    Sarah Webster - 2025 IAU 24-Hour World Championships - women's champion
    Sarah Webster of Great Britain setting a new world record at the 2025 IAU 24-Hour World Championships. Photo: iRunFar/Deki Fourcin

    iRunFar: It seemed like a fine balance of knowing how much to push at certain points and not sacrifice everything that you’d previously worked for.

    Webster: Right.

    iRunFar: I just wanted to know, how did you train for it? How do you juggle? Because you work as well, you’re not a professional.

    Webster: Yeah, I work about 30 hours a week, so training generally fits around that. This time’s a bit different. I put a lot more double days into it, and I think that really helped. So even if it meant I did an hour and a half in the morning and finished at work and then got back in the afternoon, run home from work, for instance. Because I dislocated my shoulder, I couldn’t drive for three weeks, so that actually made things a lot better because I had to run to work, I had to run to the gym, so I was ending up doing four runs a day, but doing them a lot slower. So it would be like four miles to work, four miles home, four miles to the gym, four miles back.

    But it broke the mileage up a lot, which I think really, really helped rather than concentrating on the more faster runs, which is what I would do for 100k. So I think my mileage already had been about 100 miles a week. And then for about four weeks, it was about 130 miles a week. So yeah, it was a massive jump, but they were a lot slower miles because I had still had a sling on at that point in time, and the dog had to come to work with me. And she doesn’t do quick running, She does 10-minute miles. But yeah, so she made me slow down.

    iRunFar: What do you have plans for next?

    Webster: I don’t know is the honest answer. I sort of had a plan, but it depends on what championships are available next year, I think, and what I have to do to qualify for them, if you see what I mean, and I’d like to be brave enough to do a bit of off-road running.

    I did a 50k trail run and I loved it, but the only reason I did that one was because it was basically home territory. So I was able to recce the course multiple times. Still went wrong, so I’ve got to find a course that I can recce at least some of, or have somebody who knows where they’re going to pace me some of the time, or be extremely well sign-posted. And I’m not really very good at mud either. So yeah, it’s definitely going to have to be a very easy trail run. But I do like getting off-road as well as the on-road stuff, so yeah, it’s less pressure.

    iRunFar: You don’t look at your pace all the time and like that.

    Webster: No, and if you need to walk up a hill, my general rule with the hills is, well, if I can walk faster than I can run, then I’ll walk up the hill. That’s the basic answer. But I’m not very good at downhill either, so yeah.

    iRunFar: That’d be exciting to try out.

    Webster: Yeah, yeah. Just more have a bit of fun.

    iRunFar: Congratulations and thanks very much for taking the time.

    Webster: Thank you!

    Calculated Pacing: An Interview With Sarah Webster on Her 24-Hour World Record by Deki Fourcin.


    🏃‍♂️ Recommended for Ultra Runners

    As ultra runners, we’re always looking for tools and resources to support our training and racing goals. Check out this resource that fellow runners have found valuable.

    → GraphicAudio

    FTC Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. See our Affiliate Disclosure for details.

  • Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes of 2025

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes of 2025

    The post Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes of 2025 appeared first on iRunFar.

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes - Hoka Tecton X2 Alli
    An iRunFar tester running fast in a pair of lightweight Hokas. Photo: iRunFar/Eszter Horanyi

    When finding the best lightweight trail running shoes, you want one that strikes a balance between being nimble, durable, and cushioned enough to be comfortable but light enough to let you fly. This guide shares the best lightweight trail shoes with an aim to keep the weight for a U.S. men’s 9 under 9 ounces, although two pairs snuck in just over that weight. Because the shoes here are very light, generally narrow, and with low-volume midsoles, many — but not all(!) — are not well suited for ultramarathon distances but are perfect for zooming up, down, and across everything from buttery singletrack to buttressed mountains.

    We tested the shoes across various conditions and distances to determine which were best when speed was of the essence.

    You can also learn more about finding the right lightweight trail shoes by jumping to our how-to-choose section.

    Check out our best trail running shoes guide for more generalist trail shoes.

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes - Nadir Maguet 2021-Limone-Skyrace-Extreme-champion-feature
    Lightweight shoes can make a big difference in short and steep races. Photo: Skyrunning/Maurizio Torri

    Best Overall Lightweight Trail Running Shoe: The North Face Vectiv Sky 2 ($200)

    best lightweight trail running shoe - The North Face Summit Vectiv Sky 2
    The North Face Summit Vectiv Sky 2.

    Actual Weight (U.S. men’s 9): 8.4 oz (238 g) | Stack Height: 28/22 mm heel/toe | Drop: 6 mm

    Pros:

    • Soft but poppy midsole
    • “Just enough” lug pattern provides great ground feel while descending

    Cons:

    • Midfoot lockdown could be improved
    • Ridiculously long laces

    Though it launched with less fanfare than the hyper-stacked, super-shoe counterpart Vectiv Pro 3 ($250), The North Face Vectiv Sky 2 ($200) is arguably the stronger all-around trail racing shoe between the brand’s two premium options at the moment. That’s a bit ironic, considering the Pro line has historically been the more enjoyable option, while the original Sky fell short of expectations.

    With the Sky 2, The North Face made two major changes to the upper. The tongue system has been improved and replaced with a thinner, more traditional gusseted tongue, resulting in a more secure and comfortable fit. The midsole also feels faster and more forgiving, elevating the ride quality compared to the first version.

    The Sky 2’s midsole is constructed entirely from Dream foam, a nitrogen-infused TPU that delivers a smooth, propulsive sensation underfoot. It softens the ride noticeably while also reducing weight compared to the original. The shoe also features a forked Vectiv 3.0 carbon plate with three prongs that run independently along the left, center, and right through the forefoot. These prongs merge at the midfoot and extend as a single plate through the heel. The left and right arms even wrap slightly upward, forming stabilizing “wings” along the medial and lateral sides.

    With a 6-millimeter drop (28 millimeter heel/22 millimeter forefoot stack height), the Sky 2 avoids the stability issues that plague higher-stacked models like the Vectiv Pro 3, which sits on a 40 millimeter heel. Despite being lighter than the original, the Sky 2 actually gained traction with deeper outsole lugs — now 5 millimeters, up from 3.5 millimeters — and a redesigned Surface Control rubber compound.

    This shoe stands out from the pack for one simple reason — it’s fun, extremely fast, and highly effective to run in.

    The midsole foam delivers an energetic ride, while the overall weight remains impressively competitive. Add in a remarkably capable outsole, and you’ve got a combination that makes this model hard to beat. A U.S. men’s 9 in the The North Face Vectiv Sky 2 has an actual weight of just 8.4 ounces (238 gram).

    Watch out for our forthcoming full review of The North Face Vectic Sky 2.

    Shop the The North Face Vectiv Sky 2 – Unisex

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoe for Short Distance: Brooks Catamount Agil ($180)

    best lightweight trail running shoe - Brooks Catamount Agil
    The Brooks Catamount Agil.

    Actual Weight (U.S. men’s 9): 8.0 oz (226 g) | Stack Height: 16/10 mm heel/toe | Drop: 6 mm

    Pros:

    • Great close-to-ground feeling while descending
    • Substantial lugs for a low-profile shoe

    Cons:

    • Forefoot too narrow for some runners
    • Midsole unforgiving for distances over a half marathon

    According to its maker, the Brooks Catamount Agil is its “fastest trail shoe, ever,” and after testing it on short, technical courses with steep climbs and descents, we couldn’t agree more. This isn’t a Caldera built for 100-mile ultras — it simply doesn’t have the weight or cushioning to protect your legs for that kind of pounding. But for shorter, punchy trail races where speed and agility matter most, it’s one of the best options out there.

    What sets the Catamount Agil apart right away is how low it sits to the ground. With a stack height of just 16 millimeters in the heel and 10 millimeters in the forefoot — making for a 6 millimeter drop — it offers exceptional trail feel.

    Instead of the familiar SkyVault carbon plate found in the Catamount 3, Brooks opted for a Pebax SpeedVault Trail Plate paired with their nitrogen-infused DNA FLASH v2 foam. This combination delivers a lively, propulsive ride with a surprising level of forgiveness for a plated shoe. Pebax, a polymer derived from castor beans, is lighter and more supportive than carbon, offering a smoother, more comfortable experience without sacrificing responsiveness.

    Brooks also made a bold choice with the outsole. The Catamount Agil features 4.5-millimeter deep lugs — deeper than many lightweight trail shoes. While you might feel a slight rocking sensation standing still, once you’re moving downhill, those lugs provide exceptional grip and confidence. This outsole design gives it a major advantage over rivals like the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar 2, which skimps on traction in the name of weight savings.

    Another reason the Catamount Agil excels in short-distance racing is its agility. Unlike many rigid-plated shoes that feel locked in one direction, the Agil naturally flexes and bends with quick side-to-side movements, perfect for technical trails with tight switchbacks or root-filled sections.

    Fit-wise, the Agil strikes a great balance. The one-piece mesh upper wraps the foot precisely without being restrictive, and the lacing system locks in securely. For wide feet, the upper accommodates without feeling tight, though I’d recommend sizing up if you’re between sizes, as the overall fit leans narrow. Unfortunately, Brooks doesn’t offer this shoe in the half size between 12 and 13. Still, if in doubt, size up.

    We have raced the Catamount Agil in trail races up to 12 kilometers, and it truly shines when the course is shorter but elevation gain and technical challenge are high — think vertical kilometers or fast trail half marathons. We often joke about low-stack, low-weight trail racing shoes that are like track spikes with lugs (remember the original Arc’teryx Norvan SL?). Well, in this guide, the Catamount Agil is that shoe. It would take an extremely nimble runner to use these comfortably on anything longer than 20- to 30-kilometer races.

    Shop Brooks Catamount Agil – Unisex

    Most Comfortable Lightweight Trail Running Shoe: Norda 005 ($325)

    best lightweight trail running shoe - Norda 005
    The Norda 005.

    Actual Weight (U.S. men’s 9.5): 8.1 o (230 g) | Stack Height: 28.5/21.5 mm heel/toe | Drop: 7 mm

    Pros:

    • Midsole might be the most comfortable of any current trail shoe, lightweight or not!
    • Vibram Megagrip Elite, currently exclusive to this shoe, is great on dirt roads

    Cons:

    • So damn expensive
    • Less nimble descender than some other shoes in this guide

    The Norda 005 ($325) is a standout in the lightweight trail racing category because it blends comfort, durability, and speed like few others. Unlike most super shoes, the 005 skips the carbon plate and opts for innovative materials that deliver a smooth, cushy ride without sacrificing responsiveness.

    The key to its comfort is the midsole’s Arnitel TPEE foam, which offers great energy return while staying softer and more forgiving than typical trail super shoe foams. This creates a plush yet lively platform that cushions your feet on technical terrain and long efforts without feeling harsh or dead underfoot.

    The shoe’s stack height is moderate — 28 millimeters in the heel and 21 millimeters in the forefoot for a 7-millimeter drop — which strikes the right balance between protection and ground feel. Unlike many bulky trail super shoes that feel unstable on descents, the Norda 005 stays nimble and confident on rocky, rooty downhills.

    Up top, the Dyneema bio-based upper is both ultralight and incredibly durable. It’s breathable, sheds water well, and offers a glove-like fit that keeps your foot secure but comfortable. This combination of a protective upper and plush midsole makes the 005 a shoe you can wear all day, whether racing or training.

    Outsole traction is another highlight. Vibram’s Megagrip Elite rubber, with a Tetris-like lug pattern, provides sticky, reliable grip across varied terrain, from fast fire roads to technical singletrack. The lugs are deep enough to bite but not so aggressive that they punish your calves on longer runs.

    For runners who prioritize comfort without sacrificing weight or performance, the Norda 005 is an exceptional choice. It’s durable, supportive, and cushioned enough to tackle tough terrain with confidence, all while weighing less than many traditional trail shoes. The step-in feel is unlike any shoe in this guide, the perfect plushness with efficiency.

    Watch or read our full Norda 005 review.

    Shop the Men’s Norda 005Shop the Women’s Norda 005

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoe for Technical Terrain: VJ Lightspeed ($200)

    best lightweight trail running shoe - VJ Lightspeed
    The VJ Lightspeed.

    Actual Weight (U.S. men’s 9): 8.4 oz (238 g) | Stack Height: 29/23 mm heel/toe | Drop: 6 mm

    Pros:

    • Perfect midsole mix of foam and plate makes for a very propulsive ride
    • Excellent lockdown

    Cons:

    • Requires more skill to descend confidently (even with great grip)
    • Narrow upper for some runners

    The VJ Lightspeed ($200) is one of the lightest trail shoes available for runners who like very technical terrain. The underfoot sensations are light, bouncy, and fast — and at just 8.4 ounces (238 grams) for a U.S. men’s size 9, the weight backs up that feeling. But like most of the shoes in this guide, the Lightspeed demands keen proprioceptive awareness and strong ankle and foot control to maximize the experience. It is a very narrow shoe designed for mid-to-forefoot runners who aim for quick and minimal ground contact time.

    What really sets the Lightspeed apart on technical trails is its exceptional outsole traction. VJ’s proprietary butyl-rubber outsole delivers some of the stickiest grip you’ll find on any trail shoe, holding firm on wet rocks, loose gravel, and roots. The 3.5-millimeter square lugs are a smart balance — not overly aggressive but enough to bite into loose and uneven surfaces without packing mud. Narrow outsole slits provide natural flexibility, allowing the shoe to adapt to quick directional changes and maintain contact with the trail.

    Underfoot, the shoe combines a nitrogen-infused SuperFOAMance midsole with a Y-shaped Pebax propulsion plate. This setup offers a springy ride with the right mix of cushioning and stability. The plate adds torsional support, helping your foot stay steady and responsive. Together, they promote the fast and agile footwork needed for fast running on technical terrain.

    The fit is another critical factor. The snug upper is made of a thick Kevlar-based material that wraps the foot very securely. The FitLock midsole wrap enhances midfoot lockdown, preventing unwanted foot movement during sharp turns or sudden balance shifts.

    In races, we’ve noticed the shoe’s superior grip and responsive support allow you to attack technical descents confidently. For experienced trail runners seeking a lightweight, precise racer that thrives on technical terrain, the VJ Lightspeed is hard to beat. Overall, the Lightspeed offers an exceptional blend of speed and control for runners with the foot strength and skill to maximize its technical running potential.

    Read our full VJ Lightspeed review.

    Shop VJ Lightspeed – Unisex

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoe for Up to 50k Distances: La Sportiva Prodigio Pro ($225)

    best lightweight trail running shoe - La Sportiva Prodigio Pro
    The La Sportiva Prodigio Pro.

    Actual Weight (U.S. men’s 9.5): 9.4 oz (267 g) | Stack Height: 34/28 mm heel/toe | Drop: 6 mm

    Pros:

    • Similar but more stable ride than carbon-plated shoes
    • Great rockered design

    Cons:

    • Bulkier and heavier than other shoes in this guide

    Longtime La Sportiva acolytes were caught off guard with the launch of the original Prodigio and even more so by the La Sportiva Prodigio Pro. Never before has La Sportiva offered such a soft midsole foam, an exaggerated rocker, and its signature sticky rubber in the same package. And on top of all that, the fit was even a bit forgiving, offering non-narrow-footed folks a chance to slip into its glove-like upper without consternation.

    This shoe really hits a sweet spot between cushioning, responsiveness, and durability — while still feeling light enough to keep you quick and agile on technical terrain.

    Alongside the Hoka Tecton X 3, the Prodigio Pro is about as “maximal” as things get in this guide. With a 34-millimeter stack height under the heel and 28 millimeters at the toe for a 6-millimeter drop, it’s got more stack and a burlier build than most of the svelte racers out there, which makes it all the more surprising that it tips the scales at just 9.4 ounces actual weight for a U.S. men’s 9.5 (equivalent in size to our standard U.S. men’s 9). You wouldn’t immediately peg it as a lightweight option, but it absolutely belongs in that conversation. While it can hang on steep, technical courses, the Prodigio Pro really comes alive on smooth, rolling trails where the rocker geometry lets you flow. And thanks to the FriXion XF 2.0 outsole, you still get that signature La Sportiva bite over pretty much any surface.

    The midsole is where things get really interesting. At the heart of the Prodigio Pro is La Sportiva’s XFlow Speed, which ditches the usual carbon plate in favor of a nitrogen-infused TPU core wrapped in an EVA+NITRO cage. The result is a ride that feels springy and propulsive but without the stiffness or instability you sometimes get in plated shoes. It’s responsive enough to race fast, yet forgiving enough to keep your legs intact deep into a 50k.

    Up top, the Power Wire knit-looking upper locks your foot down securely, while the knit collar adds both ankle comfort and debris protection. The fit stays snug and supportive, but — rare for La Sportiva — the toebox gives you room to splay out and swell a bit on longer days.

    The Prodigio Pro has been described as feeling like a “super shoe” without the plate. It delivers real energy return and protection without beating you up. True to La Sportiva form, durability is a strength: This is a shoe built to last through many racing seasons.

    Read our full La Sportiva Prodigio Pro review.

    Shop the Men’s La Sportiva Prodigio ProShop the Women’s La Sportiva Prodigio Pro

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoe for Smooth Singletrack: Hoka Tecton X 3 ($275)

    best lightweight trail running shoe - Hoka Tecton X 3
    The Hoka Tecton X 3.

    Actual Weight (U.S. men’s 9): 9.3 oz (265 g) | Stack Height: 40/35 mm heel/toe | Drop: 5 mm

    Pros:

    • Enjoyable midsole bounce at speed
    • Deep Vibram lugs provide great grip over many conditions

    Cons:

    • Built-in gaiter can be a deal breaker for many runners
    • Midsole provides the tippiest ride of any shoe in the guide

    The Hoka Tecton X 3 is built for speed on smooth, flowing singletrack, offering the rare combination of light weight, plush cushioning, and reliable protection. Now in its third version, the shoe benefits from refinements shaped by elite athlete feedback, and it feels more polished and versatile than ever.

    With an actual weight of 9.3 ounces for a U.S. men’s 9, the Tecton X 3 balances a 5-millimeter drop and generous 40-millimeter heel stack height and 35-millimeter forefoot stack with surprising agility. The PEBA midsole layers provide a cushioned, energetic feel, while two parallel carbon plates add a snappy, propulsive response. Unlike many plated shoes that can feel overly stiff or unstable, the plates here flex independently, giving the shoe both drive and stability when the trails get uneven. It feels powerful without being demanding, and smooth without being dull — a rare balance in the plated trail category.

    The biggest update is the Matryx upper, which now includes a knit gaiter that wraps around the ankle and tongue. This detail keeps grit and pebbles out, a small but meaningful improvement for anyone who’s had to stop mid-run to shake out debris, although any integrated gaiter is a drawback for some users. The upper offers a snug and secure fit through the midfoot while leaving enough room for comfort on longer days. Some testers found it a touch less precise on highly technical terrain, but on its intended surface — smooth, rolling singletrack — it hits the mark.

    Traction comes from a Vibram Megagrip Litebase outsole with redesigned 4-millimeter lugs. The pattern provides confident grip on both wet and dry trails, with better braking on descents compared to earlier versions, yet never feels overly aggressive on firm ground.

    Over the long term, the Tecton X 3 feels fast, springy, and stable — an ideal combination for runners who want to push the pace without sacrificing comfort over long distances. It’s equally at home in race scenarios and long training runs, offering the durability to handle heavy mileage while still feeling like a true performance shoe. For smooth singletrack where speed is the goal, this is Hoka at its best.

    Our full review of the Hoka Tecton X 3 is on its way.

    Shop the Men’s Hoka Tecton X 3Shop the Women’s Hoka Tecton X 3

    Comparing the Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes

    SHOE PRICE WEIGHT DROP
    The North Face Vectiv Sky 2 $200 8.4 ounces 6 millimeters
    Brooks Catamount Agil $180 8.0 ounces 6 millimeters
    Norda 005 $325 8.1 ounces 7 millimeters
    VJ Lightspeed $200 8.4 ounces 6 millimeters
    La Sportiva Prodigio Pro $225 9.4 ounces 6 millimeters
    Hoka Tecton X 3 $275 9.3 ounces 5 millimeters

     

    Ragna Debats - Transvulcania
    Ragna Debats racing the Transvulcania Ultramarathon. Photo: iRunFar/Meghan Hicks

    Why and How to Choose a Lightweight Trail Racing Shoe

    The shoes in this guide are best for shorter trail runs and races, such as vertical kilometers, half marathons, marathons, 50-kilometer races, and most skyrunning-style races where speed is more important than comfort. Stack height and heel-to-toe drop in lightweight shoes tend to be lower since ground feel is very important for moving fast over technical trails. The innovations that have poured over into trail running shoes from its cousins on the road — like super foams and carbon plates — can work in lightweight trail racing shoes, but there are fairly limited standouts to date.

    For some of these shoes, their relative lack of comfort and cushion limits them to particular course lengths and types of terrain. Know your shoe’s characteristics and the race course terrain, and choose accordingly. A shoe like the Brooks Catamount Agil would provide quite a beating if worn for distances longer than a marathon or 50k.

    Also, remember that these lightweight trail shoes aren’t just for races! For those of us whose daily run doesn’t often exceed 10 miles, you could log many or even most of your runs in these shoes. Even if you are not looking for the best trail racing shoes, consider the shoes in this guide perfect for daily training runs when you prefer faster-feeling shoes with a more streamlined design. For example, you would be hard pressed to find a more fun and faster shoe for virtually any run than the Norda 005, though its extremely high cost may have you from saving it just for race day. Testers found the Hoka Tecton X 3 comfortable enough for day-to-day running.

    If you’re looking for more information on trail running shoes that provide more comfort and are better suited to everyday running, check out our Best Trail Running Shoes guide. If you’re looking for even more comfort, take a look at our Best Cushioned Trail Running Shoes guide for shoes that will put plenty of bounce in your step.

    Weight

    How low should you go when choosing the best lightweight trail running shoes for your feet? All the shoes in this guide are 9.5 ounces or less, but their degrees of lightness vary greatly. If the average ultrarunning shoe is around 10 ounces, then the eight-ounce Brooks Catamount Agil will feel like an entirely different shoe class.

    While all the shoes in this guide are very light, they have different enough characteristics to make them feel significantly different. You might opt for a slightly heavier shoe, such as the La Sportiva Prodigio Pro, because of preferences for the midsole or the more aggressive outsole, or you might opt for the very lightest option because that’s what’s important to you.

    A weight limit is a good benchmark when selecting a lightweight trail racing shoe, but there are many more elements to consider, and we chose a good cross-section of shoes with multiple features besides being light.

    Some of the shoes in this guide are almost 50% lighter than normal trail running shoes. Does that make the best lightweight trail shoes minimalist? Not at all. These lightweight trail running shoes are indeed light, but that’s where the minimalist comparisons end. Many of these shoes are cushioned, grippy, durable, and robust. In fact, the Hoka Tecton X 3 and La Sportiva Prodigio Pro are fully maximal shoes at fairly minimal weights.

    Comfort

    Are any of these shoes actually comfortable? Unfortunately, many of this guide’s best lightweight trail running shoes will not win a “most comfortable” competition if you compare them to shoes made for going super long, whether in ultramarathons or all-day adventure runs.

    Most of these shoes are narrow and wide-footed runners, or those with bunions, may question which is least uncomfortable rather than choosing something particularly enjoyable to wear. The shoes here aren’t minimalist in the vein of barefoot trail running shoes, and many are actually very neutral in gait, but all are generally narrow and tough on runners with wide feet and feet prone to swelling during a long run. This is more of an issue regarding the upper and shape of these shoes rather than the midsole feel, the latter of which is fairly outstanding in all the shoes in this guide.

    All that being said, The North Face Vectiv Sky 2 is a reasonably comfortable shoe, especially for a lightweight one, and the La Sportiva Prodigio Pro has a wider and more comfortable fit than many other shoes from the brand.

    Durability

    While durability for short trail races and quick training isn’t as important as for a 100-mile race, it is still something to consider. All the shoes tested proved nearly as durable as their heavier counterparts.

    The real innovation here is that so many brands can merge cushy midsoles into lightweight shoes. To our delight, the shoes in this guide maintained the midsole ride as much as heavier shoes we’ve tested.

    In general, upper durability is not as important as the midsole and outsole when choosing the best lightweight trail running shoes, but it is still a factor. The uppers of these shoes are excellent, and we didn’t find any to wear excessively quickly. Still, because they are lightweight shoes, most of the uppers will wear out more quickly than your normal running shoes, save for the Dyneema upper on the Norda 005, as Dyneema is purportedly one of the most durable modern textiles for the weight. The updated upper of the Hoka Tecton X 3 is made of Matryx mesh and held up well on trails, and the VJ Lightspeed, even with its propensity for technical trail running and the inevitable damage that brings, has proven to be highly abrasion-resistant in rough terrain.

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes - Andreu Blanes 2022 World Mountain Running Championships Up and Down race
    Andreu Blanes wears lightweight shoes during the 2022 World Mountain Running Championships Up and Down race. Photo: iRunFar/Meghan Hicks

    Outsole and Midsole Characteristics

    The type of trail race you’re running or the terrain you train on will likely influence the type of outsole and midsole you want.

    The outsole on the Hoka Tecton X 3 is fairly low profile, but the midsole stack height is too extreme to move with reliable stability over technical terrain. The North Face Vectiv Sky 2 has an aggressive lug pattern and is excellent for descending on all terrain, but the low stack and midsole may leave you hurting after a 1,000-foot descent.

    The solution is to choose a shoe with outsole and midsole characteristics that match the course you’re running. When selecting a shoe, pay attention to the midsole density, midsole stack height, lug pattern, and the type of outsole rubber compound.

    Why You Should Trust Us

    Don’t worry; despite creating this guide for the best lightweight trail running shoes that are more appropriate for sub-ultramarathon-distance racing, we haven’t changed our name to iRunShort! Even if we are named iRunFar, we have years of experience on trails and in races of every distance.

    Many runners can and will push these shoes beyond a marathon or 50-kilometer distance, but we wanted to test shoes that would be most inviting for short and steep trail running and mountain running. This is like wearing a pair of road shoes versus spikes at a track workout — different tools for different running.

    We zeroed in on lightweight shoes that are more well-rounded for all kinds of trail running, instead of some shoes made traditionally just for running in mud or fell running. We left these out mainly because they are a category unto themselves.

    To create this guide, we researched hundreds of shoes in the trail running space, narrowed our potential shoes to those weighing 9.5 ounces or less, and took a couple of dozen shoes into the field. We tested these shoes across the U.S.’s mountain west, primarily in Boulder and Silverton, Colorado, and Bend, Oregon.

    Please note that product models are routinely discontinued in the running world, while new ones frequently come to market. At the same time, we here at iRunFar often keep using our top picks in our daily running they’re our top picks, after all! Sometimes, that continued use results in uncovering product failures. With all this — product discontinuations, product introductions, and product failures — in mind, we routinely update our buyer’s guides based on past and ongoing testing and research by our authors and editorial team. While these updates can appear to be us pushing the newest product, it’s anything but that. Most products will likely remain the same when we update any buyer’s guide. That matches our goal: to get you in the best gear you’ll use for a long time.

    Speedland SL:PDX - running outside
    Craig Randall testing trail running shoes outside Boulder, Colorado. Photo: Christin Randall

    Call for Comments

    • What are your favorite lightweight trail shoes?
    • When do you pull out your lightweight trail shoes?

    Back to Our Top Lightweight Trail Running Shoes Picks

    Best Lightweight Trail Running Shoes of 2025 by Craig Randall.


    🏃‍♂️ Recommended for Ultra Runners

    As ultra runners, we’re always looking for tools and resources to support our training and racing goals. Check out this resource that fellow runners have found valuable.

    → EconomyBookings.com

    FTC Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. See our Affiliate Disclosure for details.

  • The Translagorai Classic: A Return to Old-School Mountain Running

    The Translagorai Classic: A Return to Old-School Mountain Running

    The post The Translagorai Classic: A Return to Old-School Mountain Running appeared first on iRunFar.

    [Editor’s Note: This Community Voices article was written by Translagorai Classic organizer and ultrarunner Filippo Caon and translated by Ulla Pers.]

    In 2020, Francesco Gentilucci aka Paco told the history of Nolan’s 14 — a story that was hardly known at the time in Italy — in a well-known Italian running blog. It was the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, and after writing the article and with no races to run, Paco realized that the time had come to organize something in Italy that would bring back that intimate and essential dimension to our sport that he felt Nolan’s 14 embodied. And so he thought up the Translagorai Classic, a challenge to complete an 80-kilometer route traversing the Lagorai mountain range in Trentino in northern Italy in under 24 hours.

    Translagorai Classic - startline runners
    Runners head out from the start line arch of the Translagorai Classic. All photos courtesy of Filippo Caon.

    Inspiration for the Translagorai Classic

    For those not familiar with Nolan’s 14 history, in 1998, Fred Vance asked his friend Jim Nolan how many of the Colorado Fourteeners — mountains taller than 14,000 feet — he thought could be strung together in 100 miles. Nolan said 14. In 1999, Vance, along with his friends Blake Wood and Gordon Hardman attempted the crossing. While none of them finished that August, the following year they succeeded in organizing a start that was limited to a few participants and that had very few and simple rules: no pacers allowed, travel route alternating each year, a final cutoff of 60 hours. This was an informal event devoid of permissions that was eventually abandoned, and the route became a premier mountain route test piece with many individual fastest known time (FKT) attempts.

    Translagorai Classic - out on trail
    Much of the Translagorai Classic doesn’t have a clearly defined trail.

    Similar to Nolan’s 14, the Translagorai Classic crosses the Lagorai mountain range from east to west, from Rolle Pass to Panarotta, with more than 5,000 meters of elevation. Paco, alongside Luca Forti, who had run it solo the year before, decided to organize a collective start open to all in July of 2020. Like for Nolan’s, the rules were also very few: You have to be independent; if you decide to give up halfway through the route, you have to find yourself a vehicle, hitchhike, or return to the starting point on foot. Basically, you have to figure it out for yourself. There’s no mandatory gear; pacers are allowed; the direction changes each year — in even years it is Rolle to Panarotta, in odd years it is Panarotta to Rolle; and if you run it in less than 24 hours, we will send you a sticker at home. Don’t see it as a personal feat — there’s no heroism here. No one cares what you do; they’re only interested in the attitude with which you do it.

    Translagorai Classic - award sticker
    Those who complete the Translagorai Classic in under 24 hours receive a sticker.

    Growth of the Translagorai Classic

    In 2020, nine people left from Passo Rolle. The following year, there were 45 people, and the year after that, there were 65. Paco set up a website which records all attempts — successful and not — that are carried out both during the collective departure dates and at any other time of the year. Because the crossing has always existed and is always there, you can just go and try it any given year. In 2022, management of the collective departure passed to the Trento Running Club, an informal group of friends with whom we have also started organizing trail work activities, which are required in order to be able to participate in the collective crossing.

    Today, the Translagorai Classic is a popular route with regular FKT attempts. The men’s record is held by Nadir Maguet, set when he covered the route in 9 hours 57 minutes in 2024. Noor van der Veen also set the women’s record of 18 hours 35 minutes in 2024. The crossing takes place over very technical terrain; people really don’t grasp how slow it is until they find themselves in the thick of it. Two-thirds of the crossing is made up of endless expanses of porphyry without a defined path, where, in addition to knowing how to move, you also need to know how to orient yourself. It’s not dangerous, it’s not extreme, it’s just slow and exhausting. Not only that, but it is very isolated.

    Translagorai Classic - rocky trail
    Much of the terrain on the Translagorai Classic is slow and rocky.

    Although the Lagorai is a mountain range surrounded by the Dolomites, which are among the most anthropized mountains in the world, the Langorai have mostly managed to remain off the main tourist tracks. Since the inception of Translagorai Classic in 2020, the popularity of the area has grown. As so often happens in cases like this, precisely because no one was ever talking about the Lagorai, suddenly everyone started talking about it. To avoid the crossing becoming yet another tourist spot, over the years, together with the Translagorai Classic Board, we have tried to introduce some natural skimming systems, based not so much on luck — like a lottery — but rather on merit.

    Translagorai Classic - cowbell at finish line
    Spectators and racers at the Translagorai Classic.

    We started requiring mandatory hours of trail work, inviting participants to return each year not only to run again, but also to provide assistance — to volunteer, or simply to help. In just a few years, we have created a family around the race, one made up of people with first names and surnames who we know and see again year after year. Not only that, in recent years, precisely to preserve the size of the crossing, we have tried to keep communications low-key, using only a Facebook page and choosing not to open an Instagram profile. We have refused sponsorship from running gear companies because this would have diluted the vibrant spirit of the event, one that belongs first and foremost to the actual people who fuel it year after year. For this very reason, the experience is not for sale. We have produced a photography book which is published in a very limited edition, rejecting some offers from a couple of publishing houses.

    People who have never participated in this event might think this is our way of appearing exclusive, but it’s not like that at all. It’s simply the only way to preserve a small event from the effects of the growth of the sport. For the rest, as I wrote above, the crossing is always there. If one wants to, one need only go try it.

    Different Styles in Running

    I’ve worked on an Italian podcast this last year called “Pionieri” that covers the history of trail running in Italy from the 1980s to today. To make it happen, I spoke with many people, including athletes, race organizers, old glories, psychologists, skyrunners, and ultrarunners — all of very different ages and walks of life. I’ve spoken to the first Italians to have run 100-mile races and with the first skyrunners to have recorded 4,000-meter ascent records in the Alps. Naturally, while speaking with all these people, many different opinions emerged, some diametrically opposed, as did very different ways of perceiving the sport. It was a complicated panorama, one full of contradictions and facets, within which everyone seems to find their own space, their own corner, their own niche to follow — in short, their own style.

    Translagorai Classic - runners
    Runners head through a refreshment point at the Translagorai Classic.

    I’ve always had a very clear idea of what I wanted from this sport, and perhaps even more so of what I did not want. I’ve also always had a very precise idea of how an event should be organised, of what was right and what was wrong. Over the years, I have run very different races: skyraces and cross country, half marathons and 100 miles in the desert. I have participated in very large, commercial races and in very small ones, and I have never felt uncomfortable or out of place. Whether I found myself standing in the middle of a crowd in Place du Triangle de l’Amitié in Chamonix at UTMB or on 6th Street at the start of the Leadville 100 Mile, I’ve always felt good and very much at home.

    And so, doing those interviews for the podcast, I happened to agree with everyone — with the organizer of the big international race and equally with the solitary mountaineer, with the skyrunner, and with the amateur ultramarathon runner. I have asked myself if this was because I lack a personal opinion. Those who know me know that I have my ideas and I declare them without hesitation. So, I have come to the conclusion that if I am fascinated by all these very different souls that populate our sport, it must be precisely because they can all coexist together.

    A Blank Canvas

    For me, Translagorai is probably the thing that comes closest to the very essence of our sport. It is simultaneously logical and aesthetic. It can be tackled in a group or alone, with assistance or in total autonomy. It can be taken on discovering it one bit at a time or preparing meticulously, piece by piece, and then running, holding your breath, as fast as you can.

    Translagorai Classic - finisher
    A crowd greets a finisher at the Translagorai Classic.

    I think each race has its own style in which it must be tackled. I would never want a pacer at UTMB because it doesn’t belong to its history. I would run the Western States 100 with only two bottles at hand and the Lavaredo Ultra Trail in total self-sufficiency because those are the characteristics with which those races were born.

    The Translagorai Classic is a blank canvas open to the style of each person who runs it. It is open to each runner’s free initiative, to their individual style. For this very reason, we only publish photos of the arrivals, departures, and from the only two refreshment points. We show nothing of what lies in between. Because to show it, to speak of it, and to tell of it would deprive it of that even slightly mysterious charm that makes it what it is. This is why we are particularly harsh when a company or a large media outlet tries to speak about it, because by talking about it and gaining from it, they would take away from the people who come the right to discover it for themselves, as we all have done. And this I find to be unforgivable.

    The Lagorai mountain range provides a special place to run
    The Lagorai mountain range provides a special place to run.

    Translagorai Classic is a straight and logical line. And it’s beautiful, it’s really beautiful.

    Throughout my life, I’ve run several races that I could well consider to be a race par excellence. But at the end of the day, every year we find ourselves back in that same parking lot with one wooden arch, some friends, and a beer, doing something that feels very subversive — running a mountain crossing in 24 hours. Ultrarunning is many things, but for me, it all begins and ends right here.

    Call for Comments

    • Have you had a chance to participate in the Translagorai Classic or run in the Langorai mountain range?
    • What styles of events, routes, or running appeal to you?

    The Translagorai Classic: A Return to Old-School Mountain Running by Guest Writer.


    🏃‍♂️ Recommended for Ultra Runners

    As ultra runners, we’re always looking for tools and resources to support our training and racing goals. Check out this resource that fellow runners have found valuable.

    → EHarmony

    FTC Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. See our Affiliate Disclosure for details.

  • Building Your Ultra Running Data Platform: Cloud Storage for Training Logs

    📌 Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. This helps support our ultra running content. See our full Affiliate Disclosure for details.

    Serious ultra runners generate massive amounts of digital training data. Every run produces GPS files, heart rate data, power meter readings, and elevation profiles. After 2-3 years of consistent training, you accumulate thousands of workout files representing hundreds of thousands of data points about your running history, fitness progression, and performance patterns.

    This data is irreplaceable. Lose it and you’ve lost years of training history that informs future decisions, documents progression, and provides baselines for comparison. Yet most runners store this valuable data exclusively on local devices or free cloud services with uncertain longevity, creating unacknowledged risk to irreplaceable athletic records.

    After nearly losing years of training data to a device failure, I’ve found that using dedicated cloud storage solutions like Contabo provides secure, permanent archiving for training data that justifies minimal cost through insurance against catastrophic loss.

    What Training Data Needs Protection

    GPS and Activity Files

    Garmin FIT files, GPX tracks, Strava exports – these contain route data, pace progression, elevation profiles, and geographic records of every training run. They’re small individually (100KB-2MB per activity) but accumulate significantly:

    Annual data volume (serious ultra runner):

    • 200-300 activities per year
    • Average 400KB per file
    • Annual: 80-120MB
    • 5-year total: 400-600MB of GPS data

    Heart Rate and Physiological Data

    HR data shows fitness progression over time, letting you compare how your body responds to similar efforts across months and years. This data reveals aerobic adaptation, recovery patterns, and overtraining signals that single workouts can’t show.

    Power Meter Data

    For runners using Stryd or similar power meters, years of power files document efficiency changes, biomechanical improvements, and fatigue resistance development. This data is uniquely valuable for performance analysis.

    Race Results and Splits

    Official timing data, aid station splits, segment pacing from races. This documents actual race performance that informal tracking doesn’t capture. Having accurate splits from races 2-3 years ago enables meaningful comparison with recent performances.

    Training Logs and Notes

    Many runners maintain text logs documenting subjective training feelings, injury notes, nutrition experiments, gear testing. These qualitative records complement quantitative data files, providing context that numbers alone don’t capture.

    Photos and Videos

    Race photos, crew videos, scenic trail images accumulate across seasons. A 5-year ultra running career might generate 5,000-10,000 photos at 3-5MB each = 15-50GB of image data.

    Why Local Storage Alone Is Insufficient

    Device Failure Risk

    Computers crash, phones break, external drives fail. If your GPS watch is your only backup and it’s lost or damaged, you’ve lost all activity history not yet synced. I know runners who lost years of data to dead hard drives or corrupted Garmin devices.

    Platform Dependency

    Storing everything exclusively in Garmin Connect or Strava means your access depends on those companies’ continued existence and policy decisions. If Garmin changes data export policies or Strava shuts down (unlikely but possible), retrieving your complete history might become difficult or impossible.

    Having independent backups means you own your data regardless of platform changes.

    Accidental Deletion

    Syncing errors, accidental account deletions, or platform glitches can erase activities. I’ve seen runners lose months of data to Garmin Connect sync errors that overwrote files instead of merging them.

    Lack of Long-Term Archival Strategy

    Free cloud services (Google Drive, Dropbox free tiers) work initially but become unwieldy as data accumulates. You exceed free storage limits, files get disorganized across folders, and there’s no systematic archival structure.

    What to Store in Cloud Archives

    Primary Files (Critical)

    • Original GPS files: FIT, GPX, TCX formats from watch/device
    • Activity exports: Complete Garmin Connect/Strava bulk exports
    • Power and HR data files: Original files from devices, not just platform summaries
    • Race results: PDFs of official timing results, splits, placement

    Secondary Files (Valuable)

    • Training logs: Text files, spreadsheets tracking subjective data
    • Photos/videos: Selected highlights, race photos, crew videos
    • Gear tracking: Spreadsheets logging shoe mileage, equipment lifespan
    • Nutrition logs: Race fueling plans, successful nutrition strategies

    Tertiary Files (Nice to Have)

    • Course maps: Downloaded GPX files from races, scouted routes
    • Training plans: Coaching plans, periodization schedules
    • Research and articles: Saved studies, training articles, gear reviews

    Organizing Training Data for Long-Term Storage

    Strategic organization prevents data chaos as archives grow:

    Hierarchical Folder Structure

    Year-based top level:

    /Training_Archive/
      /2021/
        /Activities/
        /Races/
        /Photos/
        /Logs/
      /2022/
        /Activities/
        /Races/
        /Photos/
        /Logs/
    

    This structure scales indefinitely and makes year-over-year comparison easy.

    Standardized Naming Conventions

    Activity files: YYYYMMDD_ActivityType_Distance.fit
    Example: 20230615_LongRun_32mi.fit

    Race files: YYYYMMDD_RaceName_Distance.fit
    Example: 20230916_WasatchFront100.fit

    Consistent naming enables sorting, searching, and bulk operations.

    Metadata and Index Files

    Include a yearly summary spreadsheet listing all activities with key metrics:

    Date Type Distance Time Elevation Notes
    2023-06-15 Long Run 32 mi 5:24:00 4,800 ft Hot conditions, dehydration issues

    This index lets you scan yearly training without opening individual files.

    Storage Requirements and Capacity Planning

    Estimating storage needs prevents under-provisioning:

    Conservative estimate (5-year active runner):

    • GPS/activity files: 600MB
    • Training logs/spreadsheets: 50MB
    • Race results/documents: 100MB
    • Photos (curated selection): 15GB
    • Videos (race highlights): 5GB
    • Total: ~21GB

    Generous estimate (10-year career, prolific photographer):

    • GPS/activity files: 1.2GB
    • Training data: 100MB
    • Documents: 200MB
    • Photos (extensive archive): 40GB
    • Videos: 10GB
    • Total: ~51GB

    For most runners, 25-50GB covers complete training archives with room for growth. This is modest by modern storage standards but exceeds free tier limits on most platforms (15GB Google Drive, 2GB Dropbox free).

    Why Dedicated Cloud Storage Makes Sense

    Cost-Effective Scaling

    Dedicated storage services offer better price-per-GB than consumer file sync services:

    Cost comparison for 100GB:

    • Google Drive: $2/month (100GB) = $24/year
    • Dropbox: $12/month (2TB, excessive for this need) = $144/year
    • Dedicated storage (Contabo, Backblaze): $3-7/month for 100GB-1TB = $36-84/year

    When I explored dedicated storage solutions, the cost-per-GB was 30-50% lower than upgrading consumer sync services, with capacity that won’t be exceeded for years.

    Permanent Archive vs. Active Sync

    Training data archives are “cold storage” – you write once, rarely access, but need guaranteed retention. This differs from active file sync (Dropbox, Google Drive) designed for frequently accessed files.

    Cold storage services optimize for long-term retention at lower cost rather than fast access and frequent syncing.

    Independence from Platform Changes

    Self-managed cloud storage means you control retention policies, access, and data format. Garmin or Strava can’t alter your independent archives through platform changes.

    Simplified Organization

    A dedicated archive prevents training data from cluttering everyday cloud storage filled with work documents, family photos, and miscellaneous files. Keeping training archives separate maintains organization.

    Backup and Archival Strategy

    Effective data protection uses layered redundancy:

    3-2-1 Backup Rule

    • 3 copies: Primary (local device), secondary (external drive), tertiary (cloud)
    • 2 different media types: Computer hard drive + external SSD + cloud storage
    • 1 off-site copy: Cloud storage ensures geographic redundancy

    Automated vs. Manual Workflows

    Monthly manual approach:

    1. Export month’s activities from Garmin/Strava (bulk export feature)
    2. Organize files into appropriate yearly folder structure
    3. Upload to cloud archive
    4. Update index spreadsheet with monthly summary
    5. Time investment: 15-20 minutes/month

    Automated approach:

    1. Use API tools to auto-export activities weekly
    2. Script organizes files automatically
    3. Sync tool uploads to cloud
    4. Requires technical setup but runs hands-free afterward

    I use hybrid: automated weekly exports to local drive, manual monthly review and cloud upload. This balances automation efficiency with human verification.

    Accessing Archived Data

    Cold storage doesn’t mean inaccessible – just infrequently accessed:

    Historical Comparison

    Training for a repeat race, I’ll download previous year’s files for that event to compare training volume, key workouts, and race execution. This historical context informs current prep.

    Injury Analysis

    When injury occurs, reviewing months of training data often reveals gradual overload patterns that weren’t obvious week-to-week. Cloud archives let me download 6-month chunks of data for pattern analysis.

    Coaching Consultations

    New coaches often request historical training data to understand your background. Having organized archives means I can quickly provide 1-2 years of complete data rather than fragmented recent history.

    Personal Reflection

    Periodically reviewing old race files and training logs provides perspective on progression. Seeing how struggles from 3 years ago became strengths today is motivating and informative.

    What Not to Store (Avoiding Bloat)

    Strategic archiving means selective retention:

    Skip Duplicate Platform Data

    If Garmin Connect and Strava both have your data and you’ve exported original files, you don’t need platform screenshots or dashboard exports. Keep original FIT/GPX files, skip redundant platform representations.

    Limit Video and Photo Archives

    Every race photo from every angle creates terabytes of data. Archive selectively: race highlights, PRs, meaningful moments. Skip the 40 nearly-identical photos from the same aid station.

    Avoid Expired Gear Documentation

    Shoe mileage logs for shoes retired 5 years ago have limited value. Archive recent gear tracking (current season + 1-2 prior years), purge ancient equipment records.

    Recovery and Disaster Planning

    Test your backups to ensure recoverability:

    Annual Recovery Test

    Once yearly, download a random month of archived data and verify files open correctly in analysis software. This confirms archives aren’t corrupted and retrieval process works.

    Document Access Procedures

    Write down cloud storage login credentials, folder structure logic, and file naming conventions. Store this documentation separately. If you’re incapacitated or unable to access archives, family/crew should be able to retrieve data if needed.

    Account Succession Planning

    Cloud storage accounts should have designated successors or beneficiaries. Some services offer legacy contact features letting others access your account if you’re deceased or incapacitated.

    Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Annual cloud storage cost: $40-80/year for adequate capacity

    Value protected:

    • 5-10 years of training history: Irreplaceable
    • Race results and achievements: Irreplaceable
    • Performance baselines for future training: Highly valuable
    • Historical health/injury data: Valuable for medical consultations

    The cost is equivalent to 1-2 months of running shoe budget or a single cheap race entry. The value protected – years of irreplaceable athletic history – far exceeds this minimal cost.

    Final Thoughts on Training Data Archives

    Your training data tells the story of your athletic journey. It’s objective evidence of progression, documentation of what works and what doesn’t, and reference material for future decisions. Losing this data to device failure or platform changes means losing irreplaceable pieces of your running history.

    Dedicated cloud storage solutions provide insurance for this valuable data at minimal cost. The investment – less than one race entry annually – preserves years of training history that informs every future decision and documents your athletic evolution.

    You wouldn’t train for months then skip races because preparation documentation wasn’t worth protecting. Don’t train for years and risk losing all that data because backup strategy seemed too mundane to implement.

    Your training data is worth protecting. The cost is trivial. The alternative – catastrophic loss of irreplaceable athletic history – is unacceptable. Implement systematic cloud archival before device failure forces you to learn this lesson the hard way.

  • How Ultra Runners Use EconomyBookings for Budget-Friendly Race Travel

    📌 Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. This helps support our ultra running content. See our full Affiliate Disclosure for details.

    Ultra running takes place in remote locations that public transportation doesn’t serve. You can’t Uber to the Western States start line at 5 AM. Buses don’t run to Hardrock aid stations. Most ultras require personal vehicles for race logistics – but many runners fly to destination races, creating a car rental necessity that becomes expensive across multi-race seasons.

    After years of managing race travel logistics and rental car costs, I’ve found that using comparison platforms like EconomyBookings for race rental cars provides cost savings that accumulate significantly across 3-6 races annually.

    Why Ultra Races Often Require Rental Cars

    Remote Start Locations

    Most 100-milers start in mountain towns or trailheads hours from major airports. Western States starts at Olympic Valley (90 minutes from Reno airport). Hardrock starts in Silverton (6+ hours from Denver). UTMB starts in Chamonix (90 minutes from Geneva). You need transportation from airport to race.

    Aid Station Crew Access

    If you have crew supporting during races, they need vehicles to move between aid stations. Point-to-point courses (Western States, Tahoe 200, Cascade Crest) require vehicles to follow runners across 100 miles of mountain roads. Crews might need SUVs or larger vehicles for gear and multiple people.

    Course Scouting and Training Access

    Many runners arrive 2-4 days early to scout course sections and acclimate. This requires vehicles to access trailheads and remote training locations. You’re not just renting for race day – it’s 3-5 days of access to mountain roads and trails.

    Post-Race Logistics

    After finishing a 100-miler, you’re physically destroyed. You need reliable transportation back to airport without navigating public transit while barely able to walk. Rental cars provide controlled, private transport during recovery.

    The Cost Reality of Race Rental Cars

    Rental cars represent significant race travel costs:

    Typical race weekend rental:

    • Duration: 4-5 days (Thursday arrival, Monday departure)
    • Standard rate: $60-90/day
    • Total: $300-450 per race
    • Multiple races: 3-4 races/year = $1,200-1,800 annually

    That’s equivalent to 2-3 additional race entries in rental costs alone. For runners on budgets, this becomes a limiting factor on how many destination races are financially viable.

    Hidden Costs That Compound

    Airport fees and surcharges: $5-15/day in airport facility fees, concession recovery fees, local taxes

    Insurance confusion: Rental companies aggressively upsell collision damage waivers ($15-25/day) which you might not need if your credit card or auto insurance provides coverage

    Fuel policies: “Return empty” policies sound convenient but inflate costs; “full-to-full” requires finding gas stations near airport during tight departure windows

    Mileage limits: Some rentals cap miles (150-200/day); scouting courses and crew aid station runs easily exceed limits, triggering overage fees ($0.25-0.50/mile)

    These hidden costs add $50-120 per rental, making a seemingly $280 booking cost $350-400 final price.

    Why Standard Rental Booking Often Fails Runners

    Brand Loyalty Limitations

    Sticking with one rental company (Enterprise, Hertz, Budget) out of habit means missing competitive rates. Pricing varies wildly between brands in the same location at the same time – sometimes 40-50% difference for identical vehicle classes.

    Direct Booking Opacity

    Booking directly through rental company websites shows their rates but not competitors. You don’t know if you’re paying $75/day when another company offers $50/day for the same vehicle at the same airport.

    Inconsistent Pricing Logic

    Rental car pricing is dynamic and opaque. Unlike hotels (where 4-star properties generally cost more than 2-star), rental pricing depends on fleet availability, day of week, season, local events. A compact car might cost more than a midsize if compact inventory is depleted.

    This complexity means you can’t develop reliable heuristics (“always book Hertz” or “compacts are cheapest”). Each booking requires fresh comparison.

    How Rental Car Comparison Platforms Save Money

    Comparison platforms aggregate rates across multiple rental companies, showing competitive pricing in one view:

    Transparent Price Comparison

    See Enterprise, Hertz, Budget, Avis, Dollar, Thrifty rates simultaneously. This reveals pricing disparities instantly. When I compare rental rates for race travel, I consistently find 20-40% variance between most expensive and least expensive option for same vehicle class.

    Example (Western States race weekend):

    • Enterprise midsize: $82/day
    • Hertz midsize: $68/day
    • Budget midsize: $54/day

    Booking Budget instead of Enterprise saves $112 over 4 days – nearly 35% reduction for identical vehicle class.

    Filter for Critical Features

    Race rentals have specific needs: unlimited mileage (for scouting), larger vehicles (if crewing), availability during specific hours (late arrivals/early departures). Comparison platforms let you filter for must-have features before comparing prices.

    Cancellation and Modification Flexibility

    Many comparison platform bookings include free cancellation, crucial for ultra running where injuries or race changes force travel plan modifications. Being able to cancel or modify rental cars without penalty provides critical flexibility.

    Strategic Rental Car Selection for Ultra Races

    Vehicle Size Optimization

    Solo racer, no crew:

    Compact or economy car sufficient. You need reliable transportation from airport to race and back, basic gear space (duffel, drop bag, cooler). Smallest practical vehicle saves 15-25% vs midsize.

    Racer + crew (2-3 people):

    Midsize or full-size sedan. Need rear seat space for crew member, extra trunk capacity for crew supplies, aid station gear, potentially camping equipment if crew is using vehicle for lodging.

    Racer + large crew (4+ people):

    SUV or minivan. Crew needs to travel together to aid stations, carrying folding chairs, coolers, food supplies, backup gear. These vehicles cost 30-50% more than compact cars but are necessary for crew logistics.

    The mistake: over-sizing vehicles “just in case.” If you’re solo with no crew, a compact car is completely adequate. Don’t pay for SUV capacity you won’t use.

    Unlimited Mileage Priority

    This is non-negotiable for ultra race rentals. Course scouting, training runs at different trailheads, potential crew aid station loops across 100-mile courses – you’ll easily accumulate 300-600 miles during a race weekend.

    Example mileage for Western States weekend:

    • Airport to race hotel (Reno to Squaw Valley): 90 miles round trip
    • Course scouting Friday: 150 miles (various sections)
    • Race day crew movement: 200 miles (aid station to aid station)
    • Return to airport: 45 miles
    • Total: 485 miles

    At $0.25/mile overage, exceeding a 200-mile cap would cost $71 extra. Unlimited mileage avoids this completely.

    Fuel Policy Considerations

    Full-to-full (best): Receive car with full tank, return with full tank. You pay market gas prices and only for what you use. Find gas station near airport before return.

    Pre-purchase tank (acceptable if discounted): Pay upfront for full tank at rental rate (often market + 10-20%), return empty. Only makes sense if heavily discounted and you’ll truly use full tank.

    Return empty (terrible): Return car with any fuel level, rental company bills for consumed fuel at premium rates ($5-7/gallon). Never accept this.

    Full-to-full with planning (gas station stop 10 minutes before airport) saves $30-50 vs other policies.

    Insurance Decision Matrix

    Rental companies aggressively sell collision damage waiver (CDW) and other insurances ($20-30/day extra). Before purchasing:

    Check your credit card benefits: Many cards provide primary or secondary rental car coverage. Call issuer to verify coverage, countries included, vehicle types excluded.

    Review personal auto insurance: Your policy may extend to rental cars. Check with agent whether coverage applies to out-of-state rentals and if there are deductible considerations.

    Calculate risk vs cost: If card provides primary coverage, declining rental company insurance saves $80-120 per 4-day rental. For 3 races annually, that’s $240-360 saved.

    I use credit card coverage for standard rentals and only purchase additional insurance for high-value vehicles or international rentals where credit card coverage may not apply.

    Booking Timeline Strategy

    Book When Registering for Race

    Once you’re committed to a race (registration paid, travel planned), book rental car immediately if using major airport. Rates generally increase as pickup date approaches, and vehicle availability decreases during peak seasons.

    Monitor and Rebook

    With free cancellation policies, book early then monitor rates weekly. If prices drop, rebook at lower rate and cancel original. I’ve saved $40-80 per rental through this approach.

    Set calendar reminders 60 days, 30 days, and 14 days before travel to check rates.

    Consider Off-Airport Locations

    Airport rentals include facility fees and surcharges that off-airport locations avoid. If race hotel offers shuttle to nearby rental location, you might save 10-15% vs airport pickup.

    Trade-off: Convenience vs cost. Airport pickup is easier especially post-race when exhausted. Off-airport savings of $35-45 per rental might not justify logistical complications.

    Special Considerations for Different Race Types

    Point-to-Point Courses (Crew-Intensive)

    Races like Western States, Tahoe 200, Cascade Crest require crew vehicles to follow runners across long distances. Consider:

    • Larger vehicle for multiple crew members + gear
    • Extra fuel tank capacity (some aid stations are remote with limited gas)
    • 4WD if accessing aid stations on rough roads

    Loop Courses (Lower Vehicle Demands)

    Loop courses where runners pass same locations multiple times (Leadville, Massanutten, many 50Ks) require less vehicle movement. Smaller, more economical rentals work fine.

    Mountain Races in Winter/Shoulder Seasons

    Early spring or late fall mountain races might have snow/ice on access roads. 4WD or AWD becomes necessary. These cost 25-40% more than 2WD equivalents but are essential for safety and access.

    Check historical weather for race location/date before booking 2WD economy car that can’t handle conditions.

    Cost Optimization Across Racing Season

    Scenario: 3 destination races requiring rentals

    Without comparison shopping:

    • Book directly with familiar brand (Enterprise, Hertz)
    • Average cost: $380 per 4-day rental × 3 races = $1,140

    With comparison platform strategy:

    • Compare rates across all providers
    • Select best value for needs
    • Average cost: $260 per rental × 3 races = $780
    • Annual savings: $360

    That savings covers race entry fees or offsets accommodation costs.

    Common Rental Car Mistakes for Ultra Runners

    Mistake 1: Over-Sizing Vehicle

    Booking SUV when compact would work, wasting $150+ per rental on unused capacity.

    Mistake 2: Accepting Mileage Caps

    Booking 150-mile/day limit to save $8/day, then paying $75 in overage fees.

    Mistake 3: Buying Redundant Insurance

    Purchasing rental company CDW despite having credit card coverage, paying $100 for unnecessary protection.

    Mistake 4: Ignoring Fuel Policies

    Accepting “return empty” policy and paying $6/gallon for fuel vs $4.50 at gas station.

    Mistake 5: Last-Minute Booking

    Waiting until 2 weeks before race, missing cheaper early rates and better vehicle selection.

    Final Thoughts on Race Travel Rental Car Strategy

    Rental cars are necessary infrastructure for destination ultra racing, but they don’t have to be budget killers. Strategic booking – comparison shopping, right-sizing vehicles, optimizing fuel and insurance policies – saves $300-500 annually across typical multi-race seasons.

    Using comparison platforms for race rental cars takes 10 minutes per booking but yields savings equivalent to an entire race entry. The ultra running season is expensive enough without overpaying for vehicles.

    Your race budget is finite. Every dollar wasted on overpriced rental cars is a dollar not available for better race entries, quality coaching, or upgraded gear. Treating rental logistics with the same strategic planning you apply to training means more resources available for the investments that actually improve performance.

    The rental car gets you to the start line. It doesn’t need to be luxurious or expensive – it needs to be reliable, appropriately sized, and cost-effective. Strategic booking ensures you have exactly that, without paying for unnecessary upgrades or accepting inflated rates that comparison shopping easily avoids.

  • Complete Guide to Planning Multi-Race Ultra Season: Hotels and Recovery Strategy

    📌 Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. This helps support our ultra running content. See our full Affiliate Disclosure for details.

    Most ultra runners don’t just race once per year. A typical season involves 3-6 races: spring 50K tune-up, summer 100K, goal fall 100-miler, maybe a winter race. Each requires accommodations for 2-4 nights. That’s 12-24 hotel nights annually, often in small-town race locations with limited lodging options and premium race-weekend pricing.

    After several years of managing multi-race travel logistics and costs, I’ve found that using Hotels.com for race accommodation bookings provides strategic advantages beyond just finding rooms – particularly their rewards program that accumulates across multiple races per season.

    The Hotel Challenge in Ultra Racing

    Ultra race accommodation differs fundamentally from vacation travel:

    Limited Options in Small Towns

    Many 100-milers happen in tiny mountain towns: Pine (Mogollon Monster), Squaw Valley (Western States), Silverton (Hardrock), Ashland (Cascade Crest). These locations might have 3-5 hotels total. When a race brings 300+ runners plus crews and families, lodging sells out 6-12 months in advance.

    Race Weekend Price Premiums

    Hotels near major races know their value. A room that costs $80 midweek might be $180 the weekend of a popular ultra. Some properties implement minimum night stays (3-4 nights minimum) during race weekends.

    Unpredictable Logistics

    You don’t know if you’ll need 2 nights (arrive Friday, race Saturday, leave Sunday) or 3+ nights (arrive Thursday for packet pickup, race Saturday, recovery day Sunday, leave Monday). Injury or DNF might change your departure timing. Hotel bookings need flexibility that standard reservations don’t always offer.

    Multiple Rooms Across Events

    With 3-6 races annually, you’re booking 12-24 hotel nights spread across different locations, months apart. Managing separate reservations across multiple platforms becomes administratively complex.

    Why Strategic Hotel Booking Matters for Race Seasons

    Cost Accumulation

    Hotel costs accumulate faster than most runners realize:

    Example season:

    • April 50K: 2 nights × $120/night = $240
    • June 100K: 3 nights × $150/night = $450
    • September goal 100-miler: 4 nights × $180/night = $720
    • November recovery race: 2 nights × $130/night = $260
    • Total: $1,670 in accommodations

    That’s approaching the cost of a week-long international vacation – but spread across race travel makes it feel less significant until you calculate annual totals.

    Booking Timeline Complexity

    Each race has different booking windows:

    • Major races (Western States, Hardrock): Book 6-12 months out when you get lottery results
    • Mid-tier races: 3-6 months advance
    • Last-minute adds: 4-8 weeks if you sign up for something spontaneously

    You’re constantly managing bookings at different stages: some races have confirmed rooms 8 months out, others you’re booking 6 weeks before the event. This staggered timeline makes centralized management valuable.

    Cancellation and Modification Needs

    Ultra training is unpredictable. Injuries happen. Races get postponed (looking at you, pandemic years). You might need to:

    • Cancel race and hotel due to injury
    • Extend stay if recovery takes longer than expected
    • Modify dates if packet pickup schedule changes
    • Add extra night if you decide to arrive earlier for altitude adjustment

    Platforms with flexible cancellation policies and easy modification tools save significant hassle when plans inevitably change.

    The Hotels.com Strategic Advantage

    While you can book race hotels through many platforms, I’ve found specific benefits to consolidating through one service:

    Rewards Accumulation Across Races

    Hotels.com’s reward program (earn free night after certain paid stays) compounds across your racing season. Instead of 3-4 isolated bookings through different platforms earning nothing, consolidating means rewards stack.

    Example: Book 4 races worth 15 total nights through Hotels.com. Depending on the reward program structure, this might earn 1-2 free nights. Those free nights can offset:

    • Training camp accommodations
    • Pre-race scouting trips
    • Next season’s first race hotel

    When I book race accommodations through consolidated platforms, I’m essentially getting 5-10% back on hotel spending through rewards – not huge, but meaningful across $1,500-2,000 annual hotel costs.

    Centralized Booking Management

    All confirmations, modifications, and cancellations in one account. This matters when you’re managing 3-6 race weekends:

    • One login to view all upcoming reservations
    • Consistent interface for modifications
    • Historical booking records for tax documentation or expense tracking
    • Saved payment methods speed up checkout

    Comparative Pricing Visibility

    Large platforms show pricing across multiple properties in race locations simultaneously. Instead of checking individual hotel websites, you see competitive pricing in one view. This matters in small towns where 4-5 hotels might vary $40-80/night for similar quality.

    Filtering and Selection Tools

    Race-specific needs (proximity to start line, late check-out flexibility, bathtub for post-race recovery) become searchable filters rather than requiring individual property research.

    Strategic Booking Tactics for Race Seasons

    Book Early, Cancel Free

    Many Hotels.com listings offer free cancellation until 24-48 hours before arrival. My approach: book rooms immediately when I register for races (even 6-12 months out), securing prime properties before sellouts. If plans change, I cancel penalty-free.

    This locks in availability and often better pricing (hotels increase rates as race weekend approaches and rooms fill). The free cancellation provides flexibility if injury forces race withdrawal.

    Stagger Booking Timing for Price Monitoring

    For races 4-6 months away where hotels aren’t yet sold out, I’ll book a refundable room, then monitor prices weekly. If rates drop, I rebook at the lower price and cancel the original. This price-protection approach saves $30-60 per race weekend when rates fluctuate.

    Consider Shoulder Nights

    Thursday and Sunday nights (shoulder nights around Saturday race days) are often cheaper than Friday-Saturday. If logistics allow arriving Thursday instead of Friday, you might save $40-60 and reduce race morning stress by eliminating last-minute arrival pressure.

    I book Thursday arrival when possible for races more than 3 hours from home. The cost difference vs Friday arrival is often minimal, and having a relaxed Friday for packet pickup and prep is worth moderate additional expense.

    Prioritize Location Over Amenities

    For race weekends, proximity to start line matters far more than hotel amenities. A basic property 5 minutes from the start beats a luxury hotel 30 minutes away. Race morning logistics (parking, drop bags, final prep) are exponentially easier with close accommodations.

    I filter by distance first, price second, amenities third. The difference between a 5-minute drive and 25-minute drive at 4:30 AM on race morning is worth $50-80 in reduced stress.

    Check Cancellation Windows Carefully

    Some properties require 7-14 day cancellation notice, others allow cancellation up to check-in day. For races where injury risk is significant (100-milers with high DNF rates), flexible cancellation is worth prioritizing even if it costs $20-30 more.

    Managing Multi-Room Bookings for Crew

    If you have crew or family attending races, coordination becomes complex:

    Nearby vs Same Property

    Do crew members need rooms in your hotel or just nearby? Crews often leave in middle of night for aid station pacing – coordinating keys and quiet departures is easier when everyone has separate rooms vs trying to not wake sleeping family.

    My approach: I book a room for myself (rest/prep space), and crew books separately nearby. This prevents logistics conflicts when crew leaves at 2 AM and I’m trying to sleep before 4 AM race start.

    Extended Stays for Long Races

    100-milers lasting 24-30 hours create timing complications. You check in Friday, race starts Saturday 6 AM, you finish Sunday 10 AM, but checkout is Sunday 11 AM. That’s potentially 2 nights plus a late checkout or third night.

    I book 3 nights (Friday-Sunday) for 100-milers, treating Sunday post-race as recovery rather than rushing to check out. The third night costs $120-180 but eliminates post-race stress of packing and driving when exhausted.

    Using Hotels for Pre-Race Scouting

    Many ultra runners scout courses before racing (especially for 100-milers). This creates additional accommodation needs:

    Midweek Scouting Trips

    Scouting trips 2-4 months pre-race let you preview challenging sections and aid station locations. These are typically midweek (Wednesday-Thursday) when hotels are cheaper and crowds minimal.

    I scout major 100-milers 6-8 weeks pre-race, booking 1-2 midweek nights. Hotels.com rewards from previous bookings sometimes cover these scouting costs entirely through free night redemptions.

    Training Camp Accommodations

    Some runners do extended altitude or terrain-specific training camps. Booking multi-night stays (5-10 nights) generates significant rewards progress while serving training purposes.

    International Race Considerations

    For international ultras (UTMB, Ultra Trail Australia, etc.), hotel booking becomes more complex:

    Currency and Payment Processing

    Booking international properties through US-based platforms means pricing in USD with familiar payment processing. Direct booking through foreign hotel sites might involve currency conversion fees and international transaction charges.

    Cancellation Terms Clarity

    Understanding cancellation policies across language barriers can be challenging. Large platforms standardize terms in English with clear cancellation deadlines.

    Accommodation Standards Variation

    A “3-star” hotel means different things in different countries. Platforms with verified reviews from other ultra runners help calibrate expectations for international race properties.

    Cost Optimization Across Full Season

    Annual hotel spend for 4-race season:

    Without strategic booking:

    • Mix of platforms, last-minute bookings, no rewards
    • Average $175/night × 14 nights = $2,450
    • No benefits accumulation

    With consolidated strategic approach:

    • Early booking saves average $25/night
    • Adjusted average: $150/night × 14 nights = $2,100
    • Rewards: ~1.5 free nights worth $200-250
    • Net cost: ~$1,900
    • Savings: $550 annually

    That’s the cost of an entire race entry saved through strategic accommodation management.

    Practical Booking Checklist for Each Race

    When booking hotels for new race:

    1. Distance from start/finish: Under 10 minutes ideal, under 20 acceptable
    2. Arrival timing: Thursday vs Friday – price difference vs stress reduction
    3. Cancellation policy: Free cancellation preferred for races >3 months out
    4. Checkout timing: Standard 11 AM ok for 50K, need late checkout or extra night for 100-miler
    5. Amenities priority: Bathtub > Quiet location > Food nearby > Parking > Other amenities
    6. Crew coordination: Same property or nearby? How many rooms total?
    7. Rewards progress: Does this booking contribute to free night threshold?

    Final Thoughts on Season-Wide Hotel Strategy

    Ultra racing involves significant accommodation costs that most runners underestimate until they calculate annual totals. Strategic booking – consolidated through platforms with rewards, booked early with flexible cancellation, optimized for location over luxury – can save $400-600 annually while reducing administrative complexity.

    Consolidating race accommodation bookings isn’t about obsessing over every dollar – it’s about treating hotel logistics as systematically as training plans. You wouldn’t train randomly without structure; don’t book accommodations randomly without strategy.

    The ultra running season is expensive: entry fees, travel, gear, nutrition. Accommodation is one of the few categories where strategic planning provides guaranteed savings without compromising race performance. A $550 annual reduction in hotel costs funds an entire additional race entry or offsets a season of premium nutrition products.

    Your race performance depends on proper rest and logistics. Strategic accommodation booking ensures you have the right place at the right price at the right time – without breaking the budget across a multi-race season.

  • Essential VPN Guide for Ultra Runners: Secure Race Registration and Travel Planning

    📌 Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. This helps support our ultra running content. See our full Affiliate Disclosure for details.

    Ultra running registration has become a high-stakes digital event. Western States fills in 48 hours. UTMB registrations crash servers under load. Hardrock lottery requires exact timing. These aren’t casual “sign up whenever” processes – they’re competitive bottlenecks where milliseconds matter and connection security determines success or failure.

    After dealing with registration frustrations across multiple race seasons, I’ve found that using a VPN service like Surfshark for race registrations and account security provides advantages most runners don’t realize exist.

    The Digital Infrastructure of Ultra Race Registration

    Modern ultra registration happens through several platforms, each with security and access considerations:

    UltraSignup and RunSignup

    These platforms handle most North American ultra registrations. They store payment information, race history, emergency contacts, and medical data. Your UltraSignup account is a valuable identity profile containing years of race records and personal information.

    Lottery Systems

    Major races (Western States, Hardrock, Barkley) use lottery systems that require account creation, entry windows, and specific timing. These accounts store personal information and lottery entry history that determines future eligibility.

    International Platforms

    UTMB, European races, and international events use different registration systems (ITRA, local platforms) that may have different security standards and geographic access restrictions.

    Third-Party Services

    Some races use platforms like Eventbrite or custom registration sites with varying security quality. You’re trusting unknown infrastructure with payment data and personal information.

    Security Risks for Ultra Runner Accounts

    These platforms contain valuable data that creates specific risks:

    Account Takeover Attacks

    If someone gains access to your UltraSignup account, they can:

    • View your race history and personal information
    • Modify emergency contact information
    • Access stored payment methods
    • Register for races using your account (race entries have financial value)
    • View medical information you’ve provided to races

    I know runners who had UltraSignup accounts compromised and discovered fraudulent race registrations weeks later when checking their race calendar. The attacker registered for races using stored payment information.

    Public WiFi Vulnerabilities

    Runners often register for races while traveling – from coffee shops, airports, hotels. Public WiFi is notoriously insecure. Attackers on the same network can intercept login credentials and session data.

    Scenario: You’re at an airport heading to a race, registration for another race opens in 2 hours, you connect to airport WiFi to register. An attacker on that network intercepts your UltraSignup login credentials. You successfully register for the race, but now the attacker has access to your account and stored payment information.

    Data Interception During Registration

    Even if registration platforms use HTTPS (encrypted connections), public WiFi can enable man-in-the-middle attacks where attackers position themselves between you and the registration server, potentially capturing data.

    Geographic Access Restrictions

    Some international race platforms restrict registration based on IP location. UTMB and certain European races prioritize or exclusively allow registration from specific regions during early windows. If you’re traveling or training abroad when registration opens, you might be blocked based on your connection location.

    How VPN Protection Works for Race Registration

    A VPN (Virtual Private Network) encrypts your internet connection and routes it through servers in locations you choose. This provides several security and access benefits:

    Connection Encryption

    All data between your device and the VPN server is encrypted. If you’re on public WiFi and someone is attempting to intercept traffic, they see encrypted data that’s useless without the decryption keys.

    When I connect through a VPN for race registration, my login credentials and payment information are protected even if I’m using insecure coffee shop WiFi.

    IP Address Masking

    The registration platform sees the VPN server’s IP address, not your actual location. This matters for international registrations with geographic restrictions or when you’re traveling but want to appear to be connecting from your home region.

    Protection from Network-Level Attacks

    VPNs prevent local network attackers from seeing your DNS queries (which websites you’re accessing) or metadata about your traffic patterns. They only see encrypted data flowing to VPN servers.

    Strategic VPN Use for Registration Success

    Beyond security, VPNs provide tactical advantages during competitive registration windows:

    Server Routing Optimization

    During high-traffic registration events (UTMB opening, Western States lottery), some VPN server routes may have better performance to registration platforms than your default ISP routing. By testing different VPN servers beforehand, you can identify optimal routing.

    I test VPN connections to registration platforms days before registration opens, measuring latency and throughput from different server locations. For UltraSignup registrations, I’ve found certain VPN servers in Virginia and California route more efficiently than my home ISP in some situations.

    Avoiding ISP Throttling

    Some ISPs throttle connections to specific services or during peak usage. A VPN prevents your ISP from seeing which sites you’re accessing, making targeted throttling impossible.

    During a major registration event, if hundreds of runners in your area are hammering UltraSignup simultaneously, your ISP might throttle connections to that domain (even unintentionally through congestion). VPN encryption prevents your ISP from identifying which platform you’re accessing.

    Multiple Connection Testing

    Before critical registrations, I test connections through multiple VPN server locations to identify the fastest, most stable route. This redundancy means if registration opens and my primary connection is slow, I can switch VPN servers instantly.

    Account Security Beyond Registration

    VPN protection extends to ongoing account management:

    Checking Race Results and Tracking

    During races, when you’re on hotel or venue WiFi checking real-time tracking or results, VPN encryption protects your login session. This matters because race tracking platforms often use the same credentials as registration platforms.

    Managing Payment Methods

    When updating payment information or viewing past race charges, VPN protection ensures this financial data isn’t exposed to local network attacks.

    Accessing Accounts While Traveling

    If you’re training or racing internationally and need to access UltraSignup or lottery accounts from foreign networks, VPN protection provides consistent security regardless of local infrastructure quality.

    Selecting a VPN for Ultra Running Needs

    Not all VPNs are equal. Key factors for runners:

    Connection Speed

    During time-sensitive registrations, VPN speed matters. Slow VPNs add latency that could mean missing registration windows. Look for services with minimal speed overhead (10-15% reduction or less).

    Surfshark and other quality VPNs maintain 80-90% of my base connection speed, which is acceptable. Lower-quality VPNs can reduce speed by 40-50%, creating lag during critical registration moments.

    Server Location Variety

    For international race registrations, you want VPN servers in multiple countries. If a European race restricts early registration to EU IPs, having VPN servers in France, Germany, or Italy lets you appear to be connecting from those regions.

    Multi-Device Support

    You might register for races from laptop, tablet, or phone depending on where you are when registration opens. VPNs that support simultaneous connections across devices provide flexibility.

    Ease of Use

    When registration opens in 30 seconds and you need VPN protection immediately, you don’t want complex configuration. Services with one-click connection and automatic server selection remove friction.

    Reliability During Peak Load

    Some VPNs become congested during peak usage. For race registration, you need a service that maintains performance even when many users are connected simultaneously.

    Real-World Registration Scenarios

    Scenario 1: UTMB Registration from the US

    UTMB registration is fiercely competitive. Early registration windows sometimes prioritize European IPs. By connecting through a VPN server in France, I’ve successfully registered during EU-priority windows that might have blocked or deprioritized my actual US connection.

    Scenario 2: Airport WiFi Registration

    Flying to a race, registration for another race opens in 3 hours, only internet access is airport WiFi (notoriously insecure). VPN encryption means I can safely register without worrying about credentials being intercepted on the public network.

    Scenario 3: Hotel Room During Race Weekend

    At a race hotel with marginal WiFi security (no password required for network access). Checking my UltraSignup account to verify drop bag details, VPN ensures this session isn’t exposed to other hotel guests on the network.

    Scenario 4: Coffee Shop Lottery Entry

    Hardrock lottery entry deadline is today, I’m traveling and only have coffee shop WiFi access. VPN protection means entering the lottery doesn’t expose my account credentials to network vulnerabilities.

    Additional Security Practices

    VPN protection should be part of a broader security approach:

    Unique, Strong Passwords

    Use unique passwords for each race platform. A password manager generates and stores complex passwords so you’re not reusing the same password across UltraSignup, UTMB, local race platforms.

    Two-Factor Authentication

    Enable 2FA wherever platforms offer it. Even if credentials are compromised, attackers can’t access your account without the second factor (authentication app code or SMS code).

    Regular Account Audits

    Periodically check race accounts for unauthorized activity: unknown race registrations, payment method changes, contact information modifications.

    Dedicated Payment Method

    Consider using a dedicated credit card for race registrations rather than your primary card. This limits exposure if payment information is compromised through a race platform breach.

    Cost-Benefit Analysis

    VPN costs: $3-10/month ($36-120/year) for quality services

    Value protected:

    • Race entries: $300-2,000 in annual registrations
    • Personal data: Years of race history, medical information, emergency contacts
    • Payment information: Protection from fraud that could compromise thousands in charges
    • Lottery positioning: Some lottery systems track entry history (Western States) – account compromise could affect future eligibility

    The cost of VPN protection is a fraction of a single race entry, yet it protects access to registrations collectively worth thousands and personal data that has no price.

    Common Misconceptions

    “I Don’t Access Anything Sensitive Enough to Need a VPN”

    Your race accounts contain payment methods, medical history, emergency contacts, and personal information. That’s sensitive data worth protecting.

    “HTTPS Encryption Is Enough”

    HTTPS encrypts data between you and the website but doesn’t protect against local network attacks that intercept credentials before encryption or after decryption. VPNs add a layer that protects the entire connection.

    “VPNs Are Too Complicated”

    Modern VPNs have become remarkably simple: install app, click connect, choose server location. The configuration complexity of earlier VPN implementations is gone.

    Final Thoughts on VPN Protection for Ultra Runners

    As race registration becomes more digital, competitive, and valuable, the security of our accounts and registration processes matters more than most runners realize. A compromised account doesn’t just mean inconvenience – it can mean lost race entries, fraudulent charges, and exposed personal data.

    VPN services like Surfshark provide insurance against these risks at minimal cost. The investment is tiny compared to what you’re protecting: thousands in race entries, years of personal data, and the competitive advantage of secure, optimized registration connections.

    Your training deserves protection. Your race entries are valuable. Your personal information matters. In an environment where registration windows fill in hours and account security determines access to the races you’ve trained months to run, VPN protection isn’t paranoia – it’s practical infrastructure that ensures your digital access matches the physical preparation you’ve invested.

  • How to Get Internet for Remote Trail Running and Training Locations

    📌 Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. This helps support our ultra running content. See our full Affiliate Disclosure for details.

    Ultra running training takes you to remote locations: mountain trails hours from cell service, high-altitude training camps, rural towns hosting key races. This creates a connectivity paradox: your training depends on GPS-based coaching platforms, Strava uploads, video consultation with coaches, and real-time race tracking – yet you’re often running in places where internet access is unreliable or nonexistent.

    After struggling with inadequate connectivity during critical training blocks and races, I’ve found that portable internet solutions like HomeFi solve problems most runners don’t realize are compromising their training until it’s too late.

    Why Ultra Runners Need Reliable Internet Access

    It’s easy to assume internet is a luxury, not a necessity, for running. You put on shoes and go, right? But modern ultra training is deeply integrated with digital infrastructure:

    1. GPS and Training Data Management

    Every training run generates GPS data that’s useless unless uploaded to analysis platforms. Garmin, Strava, TrainingPeaks, Coros – all require internet to sync data. Miss uploads for weeks during a remote training block and you lose critical feedback on volume, vertical gain, and pace progression.

    I learned this the hard way during a 3-week training camp in Colorado. Spotty cabin WiFi meant I couldn’t upload runs for 2 weeks. When I finally got reliable internet, I had to retroactively analyze 120+ miles of training data and realized I’d been running too hard on recovery days – but only noticed after damage was done.

    2. Remote Coaching and Video Consultations

    Many serious ultra runners work with remote coaches who analyze training data weekly and conduct video check-ins. These consultations require stable internet for video calls and large file uploads (GPX files, heart rate data, power meter files).

    If you’re training in remote locations but your coach is reviewing data in real-time, connectivity disruptions create lag in feedback loops. Problems compound before you realize what’s going wrong.

    3. Race Registration Timing

    Many ultra lotteries and registrations open at specific times (Western States lottery, Hardrock lottery, UTMB registration). These happen on exact dates regardless of where you’re training. If you’re in the mountains with unreliable internet when registration opens, you miss opportunities.

    I nearly missed Cascade Crest 100 registration because I was training in a remote area with no cell service. Registration filled in 4 hours; by the time I reached internet access, it was waitlist only.

    4. Weather and Route Planning

    Remote training requires real-time weather data and route planning. Apps like Gaia GPS, AllTrails, and weather services need internet to download maps and updates before heading into backcountry. Without connectivity before runs, you’re navigating blind.

    5. Family and Crew Communication

    When training in remote locations, family needs to reach you for emergencies. During races, crews need real-time tracking data to meet you at aid stations. Internet disruptions create logistical chaos and safety concerns.

    Connectivity Challenges in Remote Training Locations

    Standard solutions (cell phones, public WiFi, hotel internet) fail in the locations ultra runners frequent:

    Rural Cell Coverage Gaps

    Cell carriers claim nationwide coverage, but mountainous areas have massive dead zones. Regions popular for high-altitude training (Leadville, Flagstaff, Bend) often have spotty coverage outside town centers.

    I’ve stayed in cabins 15 minutes from Leadville with zero cell signal from any carrier. Town has coverage; surrounding training areas are complete dead zones.

    Unreliable Public WiFi

    Coffee shops and libraries work for casual browsing but struggle with large file uploads (hours of GPS data, video calls). Connection drops mid-upload corrupt files or require restarting transfers.

    Plus, relying on public WiFi means structuring your daily schedule around business hours and locations – not ideal when you’re running 20 miles at dawn then needing to upload data immediately for coach review.

    Hotel Internet Limitations

    Budget hotels in rural race towns often have barely-functional WiFi that can’t handle multiple devices. During race weekends, hotel internet collapses under load from hundreds of runners trying to upload GPS data simultaneously.

    Before Mogollon Monster 100, I spent 90 minutes trying to upload a single run file from my hotel in Pine, Arizona. The connection kept dropping, corrupting uploads. Eventually I gave up and drove to McDonald’s parking lot.

    Remote Rental Properties

    Airbnbs and cabins near training areas often advertise WiFi, but “WiFi available” covers a wide range from “fiber optic” to “satellite connection that works when it feels like it.” You discover which one it is after you’ve driven 4 hours.

    How Portable Internet Solutions Solve These Problems

    Portable WiFi hotspots using cellular data provide consistent, device-independent internet access wherever you’re training. Unlike relying on phone tethering or local infrastructure, portable solutions offer several advantages:

    Multi-Device Connectivity

    Connect watch, phone, laptop, tablet simultaneously without draining phone battery through tethering. This matters when you need to upload GPS data from your watch while video calling your coach on laptop while spouse is streaming on tablet.

    Better Antenna Technology

    Dedicated hotspot devices often have superior antenna design compared to phones, meaning better signal in marginal coverage areas. I’ve had portable hotspots maintain usable internet where my phone shows no service.

    Data Plan Flexibility

    Unlimited data plans mean you’re not rationing uploads or worrying about overage charges. Upload every run, stream coaching videos, download offline maps without anxiety about data limits.

    Independence from Local Infrastructure

    You’re not dependent on hotel WiFi quality, coffee shop hours, or finding public access. Internet follows you to remote cabins, trailheads, race venues.

    Real-World Ultra Running Scenarios

    Specific situations where portable internet has saved training blocks and races:

    Multi-Week Training Camps

    Spending 2-4 weeks at altitude requires consistent connectivity for ongoing coach communication and data analysis. I did a 3-week camp in Flagstaff living in a cabin with no WiFi. Portable internet meant daily uploads, video check-ins with my coach, and real-time training adjustments.

    Without this, I would have been training blind for weeks, potentially building fatigue or missing key adaptations.

    Race Weekend Logistics

    Race weekends involve complex coordination: crew communications, drop bag planning, real-time tracking for family. Having reliable internet in remote race locations (many 100-milers happen in tiny mountain towns) eliminates communication chaos.

    During Bear 100, my crew used portable internet in their RV to monitor my tracker while moving between remote aid stations. Cell service was nonexistent at several locations; internet access meant they knew exactly when to leave for the next aid station.

    Last-Minute Route Research

    Weather changes force route modifications. Snow closes high passes, heat makes exposed routes dangerous. Real-time internet access before training runs lets you download updated maps and conditions.

    I’ve been at trailheads with changing weather needing to quickly download alternate route maps. Phone service was marginal but portable hotspot maintained connection strong enough to download what I needed.

    Emergency Communication

    Training in remote areas requires emergency connectivity. If you’re injured on a trail and need to contact help, or family has an emergency and needs to reach you, having reliable internet enables communication that cell service alone might not provide.

    Selecting a Portable Internet Solution

    Key factors for ultra runners when choosing portable connectivity:

    Coverage Area

    Check which cellular network the device uses and verify coverage in your training regions. Different carriers dominate different areas – Verizon is strong in some mountain regions where T-Mobile is nonexistent, and vice versa.

    If you primarily train in a specific region (e.g., Colorado Rockies), research which carrier has best coverage there and choose a hotspot using that network.

    Data Limits and Speed

    Unlimited data is essential. GPS file uploads are small, but video calls with coaches, downloading offline maps, and streaming content consume significant data. Throttled speeds after caps make real-time coaching impossible.

    Battery Life

    All-day battery life matters for race weekends when you’re away from power sources for 12+ hours. Look for devices rated for 8-10+ hour operation or bring portable chargers.

    Number of Connected Devices

    Ensure the hotspot supports enough simultaneous connections for your needs. If you’re sharing with crew or family, you might need 5-8 device capacity.

    Setup Simplicity

    When you arrive at a remote cabin exhausted from a 30-mile training run, you don’t want complex configuration. Plug-and-play solutions that work immediately save frustration.

    Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Portable internet isn’t free, but compared to the cost of ultra running, it’s a small percentage:

    Typical costs:

    • Device cost: $100-300 one-time
    • Monthly service: $50-100/month
    • Annual total: $700-1,500

    Compare to other running costs:

    • Shoes (6-8 pairs annually): $1,000-1,400
    • Race entries (3-5 ultras): $600-1,500
    • Travel to races: $1,500-3,000
    • Coaching: $150-400/month = $1,800-4,800/year

    If you’re paying for coaching but can’t reliably upload data or do video consultations, you’re wasting coaching fees far exceeding internet costs. The connectivity becomes training infrastructure as essential as GPS watches or heart rate monitors.

    Practical Tips for Using Portable Internet

    Pre-Download Critical Data

    Even with portable internet, connectivity in mountains will sometimes be marginal. Before heading into backcountry, download offline maps, weather forecasts, and route files while you have strong signal.

    Schedule Uploads Strategically

    Upload training data during times when you have best signal rather than immediately post-run. If evening signal is stronger than morning, batch upload then.

    Use Video Call Compression

    For coach consultations over marginal connections, use lower video quality settings (720p vs 1080p) to maintain stable calls on limited bandwidth.

    Monitor Data Usage

    Even with unlimited plans, some throttle after heavy usage. Track which activities consume most data and optimize where possible (download maps on WiFi before leaving home, upload video files only when necessary).

    Final Thoughts on Connectivity for Ultra Running

    As ultra running becomes more data-driven and digitally integrated, reliable internet access in remote training locations transitions from luxury to necessity. The sport takes us to beautiful, remote places – but our training optimization depends on consistent connectivity that those places often lack.

    Portable internet solutions solve this disconnect elegantly: you maintain the freedom to train in remote, optimal locations while keeping the digital infrastructure that makes modern training effective. The investment is small compared to total ultra running costs and preserves the value of other training investments like coaching and technology.

    Your training plan is worthless if you can’t upload data for analysis. Your coach can’t help if you can’t video call for consultations. Your crew can’t support if they can’t track you during races. In 2025, connectivity isn’t optional for serious ultra running – it’s foundational infrastructure that determines whether everything else works.

  • Why Runners with ADHD Love Ultra Marathons: The Science Behind It

    📌 Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. This helps support our ultra running content. See our full Affiliate Disclosure for details.

    Ultra running training involves hundreds of hours annually of long, repetitive runs. A typical 100-mile training cycle requires 40-60 long runs of 2-6+ hours each – that’s 150-300 hours of running time before you even toe the start line. Managing the mental challenge of this volume matters as much as the physical training.

    After years of experimenting with every audio solution during training runs, I’ve found that GraphicAudio’s full-cast audio productions solve a problem most ultra runners don’t realize they have: the psychological fatigue of undertrained mental engagement during long, easy runs. While these runs build aerobic base physically, they can be mind-numbingly boring – leading many runners to cut them short or skip them entirely.

    The Mental Challenge of High-Volume Training

    Most running advice focuses on physical adaptations: building mitochondria, improving lactate threshold, strengthening connective tissue. But ultra training’s mental component gets overlooked. Spending 20-30 hours monthly running at easy conversational pace isn’t physically demanding for trained runners – it’s psychologically challenging.

    The issue isn’t motivation exactly. I’m motivated to run 100 miles in competition. But motivation doesn’t make a solo 25-miler on familiar trails at 10:00/mile pace intellectually engaging. Your body can do this work easily; your mind rebels against the tedium.

    This psychological barrier leads to three problematic behaviors:

    1. Running Faster Than Intended

    Boredom makes runners speed up unconsciously. You’re supposed to run 3 hours at easy pace (heart rate zone 2), but boredom creeps in at 45 minutes and suddenly you’re pushing tempo pace just to make the run feel challenging. This compromises the aerobic adaptation these runs are designed to build.

    2. Cutting Runs Short

    The plan says 4 hours, but at 2.5 hours you’re mentally done despite feeling physically fine. You rationalize: “I got most of the benefit,” or “I’ll make it up next week.” But consistently cutting long runs short sabotages your 100-mile prep.

    3. Skipping Long Runs Entirely

    When long runs become psychologically dreaded rather than enjoyable, motivation erodes. You find excuses: “I’m still recovering from last week,” or “weather isn’t ideal.” These runs disappear from your schedule despite being the most important training stimulus for ultra distance.

    Why Traditional Audio Solutions Fall Short

    Most runners default to music or podcasts. Both have limitations for ultra training:

    Music Limitations

    Pros: Energizing, easy to zone out to, minimal cognitive load
    Cons: Becomes repetitive on 3-4 hour runs, encourages faster pacing, doesn’t prevent mental fatigue

    Music works brilliantly for tempo runs and workouts where you want amped-up energy. But on long easy runs, music has a ceiling effect – after 90-120 minutes, even your favorite playlists become background noise that doesn’t prevent boredom.

    Podcast Limitations

    Pros: Intellectually engaging, free, endless variety
    Cons: Conversational format allows attention drift, production quality varies wildly, you miss content during focus lapses

    I’ve tried podcast-only long runs. Inevitably, around mile 8-10, my attention drifts. I’ll “wake up” 15 minutes later realizing I haven’t processed anything said. The conversational, lower-production format doesn’t command sustained attention over 3-4 hours.

    Traditional Audiobook Limitations

    Pros: Long-form content, narrative engagement
    Cons: Single-narrator delivery can be monotonous, easy to zone out, no atmospheric elements

    Regular audiobooks are better than podcasts for long runs, but single-voice narration often feels sleep-inducing at easy pace. Your mind wanders, you miss plot points, and you’re rewinding constantly.

    The GraphicAudio Difference

    GraphicAudio markets itself as “A Movie in Your Mind” – full-cast audio productions with sound effects, musical scoring, and theatrical delivery. Initially I thought this was marketing hype. After using their productions on 100+ training runs, I understand it’s an accurate description of how different the experience is from traditional audiobooks.

    Full Cast vs. Single Narrator

    Traditional audiobook: One narrator performing all character voices, often reading in steady monotone.
    GraphicAudio: Each character performed by a different voice actor with distinct delivery styles.

    This matters more than you’d expect during long runs. The variety of voices prevents the monotony that makes single-narrator books sleep-inducing. When listening to GraphicAudio productions, characters feel like distinct people rather than one person doing impressions. This heightened engagement keeps your mind occupied for 3-4+ hour efforts.

    Sound Effects and Musical Scoring

    GraphicAudio adds cinema-quality sound design: environmental sounds, action effects, and orchestral music scored to narrative beats.

    Example: A battle scene includes clashing swords, explosions, background chaos, and dramatic scoring that builds tension. A quiet character moment has subtle environmental ambiance and softer musical themes. This atmospheric production creates immersion that holds attention far better than straight narration.

    During long runs, this production quality prevents the “zoning out” problem. You’re pulled into the story rather than using it as background noise.

    Pacing and Energy Variation

    GraphicAudio productions feel more like radio drama than audiobooks. The pacing varies – intense action scenes, quiet character development, plot twists delivered with theatrical timing. This variation maps well to ultra training where you’re running steady effort but want mental stimulation to vary.

    How I Use GraphicAudio in Training

    My systematic approach to integrating audio content without compromising training quality:

    Easy Long Runs (Foundation Training)

    These runs (70-80% of training volume) are about aerobic base and time on feet. Perfect for GraphicAudio. I’m not focused on precise pace control or interval timing – just maintaining easy conversational effort for 2-5 hours. The audio content makes this psychologically manageable and even enjoyable.

    Typical run: 25 miles, 4-5 hours, heart rate zone 2, mountainous terrain. I’ll consume 4-6 hours of GraphicAudio content (running at 1.0x speed). The story progression gives the run structure beyond just accumulating miles.

    Recovery Runs

    Short (45-75 minutes), very easy pace, day after hard efforts. These are mentally boring despite being necessary. GraphicAudio makes them pass quickly and prevents the temptation to run harder than recovery effort should be.

    Mid-Week Medium-Long Runs

    2-3 hour runs at steady aerobic pace. Still building base but shorter than weekend long efforts. Perfect for continuing whatever GraphicAudio series you’re working through. Provides continuity and something to look forward to.

    What I DON’T Use GraphicAudio For

    Tempo runs and threshold work: These require precise effort monitoring. Audio drama would distract from the focused discomfort these workouts demand.

    Interval sessions: Need to hear watch beeps and maintain exact pacing. Entertainment isn’t appropriate.

    Technical trail runs: When terrain demands constant attention (steep descents, rocky sections, exposure), I run without audio for safety.

    Race-specific practice: I do some long runs without any audio to practice racing without entertainment dependency.

    Building Your GraphicAudio Library for Training

    Strategic content selection enhances training enjoyment:

    Series vs. Standalone Books

    Series work better for training blocks. If you’re deep in a 100-mile training cycle (16-20 weeks), having 8-12 books in a series means consistent characters and world across months of training. You’re not starting fresh mentally every week.

    I’ve found fantasy and sci-fi series work best: Brandon Sanderson’s Stormlight Archive (10+ hours per book, 5 books), The Expanse series (9 books), Wheel of Time (14 books). These provide 100+ hours of continuous content – enough for an entire training cycle.

    Matching Content to Run Type

    Action-heavy books: Great for medium-long runs (2-3 hours) where plot momentum helps time pass
    Character-development focused: Better for ultra-long runs (4-6 hours) where you settle into contemplative pace
    Mystery/thriller: Excellent when motivation is low – plot hooks keep you engaged

    Managing Plot Cliffhangers

    One unexpected benefit: thrilling plot moments make you genuinely want to do your next long run. I’ve caught myself actually looking forward to a 4-hour training run because I’m desperate to know what happens next in a book. This psychological trick transforms obligatory training into something you’re motivated to complete.

    Cost Analysis for Serious Runners

    Training for 100-milers requires 150-300 hours of running annually. If half that time is easy/long runs suitable for audio content, you need 75-150 hours of engaging material yearly.

    Podcast-only approach: Free, but quality inconsistent and attention drift problematic
    Music/streaming services: $10-15/month = $120-180/year, but limited engagement for long runs
    Traditional audiobooks: $15-30 per book on Audible = $180-360/year for 12-24 books
    GraphicAudio library: Higher upfront but builds permanent collection you can re-listen

    I think about audio content as training infrastructure like running shoes or GPS watches. If it makes the difference between completing your long runs consistently versus cutting them short or skipping them, it’s worth far more than the cost suggests.

    Using Audio Content Without Becoming Dependent

    Legitimate concern: If you train exclusively with audio entertainment, can you race without it? Some race allow headphones; many don’t (Western States, Hardrock, most European ultras).

    My approach: 80% of training runs use audio content, 20% are “silent” runs practicing racing without entertainment. This builds mental resilience while leveraging audio benefits for the majority of training volume.

    During these silent runs, I practice the mental strategies I’ll use in no-headphone races: counting steps, observing surroundings, internal dialogue management, meditation techniques. But I don’t make ALL training runs an exercise in mental suffering – that’s how you burn out on the sport.

    Final Thoughts on Audio Content for Ultra Training

    The mental component of ultra training gets far less attention than physical adaptation, but it’s equally important. If psychological boredom makes you skip long runs or cut them short, you’re compromising the training stimulus that determines 100-mile readiness.

    Quality audio productions like GraphicAudio solve this problem elegantly: they make long, easy runs psychologically manageable while you’re building the aerobic base and time-on-feet adaptations that ultra distance demands. The investment in engaging content pays dividends in training consistency – which ultimately determines race performance more than any single workout.

    Your body can handle 30 hours of monthly running. The question is whether your mind can stay engaged enough to complete that volume without rebellion. For me, the answer is yes – but only with the right audio content to make hundreds of hours of training time something I genuinely look forward to rather than grudgingly endure.

  • Best Audiobooks for Long Training Runs: Ultra Runner’s Complete Guide

    📌 Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links at no additional cost to you. This helps support our ultra running content. See our full Affiliate Disclosure for details.

    As an ultra runner with ADHD, I’ve spent years trying to figure out how my brain affects my running. The hyperfocus that lets me dial in on a 100-mile race for 24+ hours is the same neurological wiring that makes structured training plans feel impossible some weeks. Understanding this relationship transformed both my running and my life.

    When I discovered that many elite ultra runners also have ADHD – and that the sport actually attracts our neurotype – everything clicked. The long, repetitive nature of ultra training provides the dopamine regulation our brains crave. But optimizing performance when you have ADHD requires different strategies than neurotypical training approaches. One unexpected tool that helps: GraphicAudio’s immersive audiobook productions during long training runs provide the exact level of mental engagement I need to maintain focus for 4-6 hour efforts.

    Why Ultra Running Appeals to ADHD Brains

    The ADHD brain functions differently around dopamine regulation, reward processing, and sustained attention. Traditional sports with short, intense bursts (basketball, soccer) can be challenging for ADHD athletes because the constant task-switching overwhelms executive function. But ultra running’s specific characteristics align surprisingly well with ADHD neurology:

    1. The Hyperfocus Advantage

    ADHD isn’t actually an attention deficit – it’s an attention regulation challenge. When something captures our interest deeply, we can hyperfocus for hours beyond neurotypical capacity. In a 100-mile race, this trait becomes an superpower. While other runners struggle with mental fatigue at mile 60-80, ADHD runners often hit a flow state where time distorts and miles disappear.

    I’ve experienced this repeatedly: reaching mile 70 of Leadville and realizing I’ve been completely absorbed in the rhythm of running for 6+ hours straight, barely aware of time passing. This isn’t willpower or toughness – it’s my ADHD brain locking onto the task with intensity that neurotypical runners describe as remarkable.

    2. Novelty and Variable Rewards

    ADHD brains crave novelty and respond powerfully to variable rewards. Ultra running delivers both constantly: changing terrain, weather shifts, aid station interactions, the unpredictability of how your body will respond mile to mile. Each segment of a 100-miler presents new challenges and micro-rewards (reaching an aid station, cresting a mountain pass, sunrise after a night section).

    Road marathons, by contrast, offer limited novelty – same pace, same flat course, minimal variation. My ADHD brain finds this excruciating. But throw me on a mountain trail for 20+ hours with constantly changing conditions? Suddenly I’m engaged for the duration.

    3. The Dopamine of Physical Movement

    Exercise increases dopamine production – exactly what ADHD brains need for better focus and mood regulation. Long runs provide sustained dopamine elevation that many ADHD runners describe as better than medication for managing symptoms. I’m notably calmer, more focused, and emotionally regulated on days I run 2-3+ hours versus rest days.

    This isn’t just anecdotal: research shows endurance exercise improves ADHD symptoms comparably to low-dose stimulant medication in some individuals. For many of us, ultra training IS medication.

    ADHD Challenges in Ultra Training

    While racing leverages ADHD strengths, training presents unique challenges:

    Consistency and Routine Struggles

    ADHD makes consistency difficult. Some weeks I execute my training plan perfectly. Other weeks, the thought of my scheduled 20-miler creates such resistance that I’d rather do literally anything else. This isn’t laziness – it’s executive dysfunction around tasks that don’t provide immediate dopamine hits.

    My solution: extreme flexibility in training structure. Instead of rigid “Tuesday = tempo run,” I plan weekly mileage blocks and run when motivation strikes. If I wake up Tuesday with zero running motivation but Thursday I want to crush a long run, I adjust. This honors my ADHD brain’s variable motivation patterns while maintaining training volume.

    Time Blindness and Schedule Management

    ADHD often includes “time blindness” – difficulty accurately perceiving time passage. This makes estimating run duration challenging. I’ll think “I’ll run for an hour” and return 90 minutes later, disrupting the rest of my day’s schedule.

    Tools that help: GPS watches with elapsed time prominently displayed, setting phone alarms for turnaround points, and building substantial buffer time into my daily schedule around runs. I stopped trying to run from 6-7 AM before work; instead I block 5:30-8:00 AM for “running activities” to account for my time perception variability.

    Boredom on Long, Easy Runs

    ADHD brains struggle with understimulation. Easy-pace long runs – the foundation of ultra training – can feel mentally excruciating despite being physically easy. My mind wanders, I check my watch every 90 seconds, and 3-hour runs feel like 6-hour slogs.

    This is where audio content becomes essential. But not podcasts – I’ve found that GraphicAudio’s full-cast productions with sound effects and music provide the exact level of mental engagement I need. The theatrical quality keeps my ADHD brain stimulated enough to prevent boredom spiraling, but not so engaging that I lose awareness of pace, terrain, and fueling needs.

    The GraphicAudio Solution for ADHD Training Runs

    I’ve tried every audio solution during training: podcasts, regular audiobooks, music, nothing at all. Each has limitations for ADHD runners:

    Podcasts: Interesting for 30-45 minutes, then my attention drifts. I realize I haven’t absorbed anything said in the last 10 minutes. The conversational, lower-production format doesn’t hold my ADHD focus for 3-4 hour runs.

    Traditional audiobooks: Single-narrator format puts me to sleep on easy-pace runs. My brain needs more stimulation than one voice reading text.

    Music: Great for tempo runs and workouts, but on long easy runs, even my favorite playlists become repetitive and boring after 90 minutes.

    Silence: Absolute nightmare for my ADHD brain. Without external stimulation, my thoughts become invasively loud, anxiety spirals, and I obsessively check my watch every 2 minutes.

    GraphicAudio’s “movie in your mind” format hits the sweet spot: engaging enough to prevent boredom, theatrical enough to hold ADHD attention, but not visually demanding (like trying to watch shows while running, which I’ve also attempted – don’t recommend). The full cast, sound effects, and orchestral scoring create an immersive experience that makes 4-hour training runs psychologically manageable.

    How I Use GraphicAudio in Training

    My system for integrating audio content without compromising training quality:

    Easy long runs (70-80% of training volume): Full GraphicAudio productions. These runs are about time on feet and aerobic base – I don’t need intense focus on pace or effort. The audio content prevents mental fatigue and boredom that would otherwise make me cut runs short.

    Tempo and threshold work: Music only. These runs require precise effort monitoring that audio drama would interfere with.

    Easy recovery runs: GraphicAudio or podcasts. Lower stakes runs where entertainment matters more than performance metrics.

    Race-specific workouts: Nothing or white noise. I practice running without entertainment dependency to prepare for races where I might not use audio.

    This structure lets me leverage audio content for ADHD management while maintaining the workout quality needed for performance gains.

    ADHD-Specific Race Day Strategies

    Race day brings different challenges for ADHD runners:

    Managing Pre-Race Anxiety and Activation

    ADHD often includes anxiety disorders and difficulty regulating emotional activation. Pre-race nerves can spiral into overwhelming anxiety that degrades performance. I’ve learned to recognize when my ADHD brain is getting too activated and have developed grounding techniques specific to ultra racing.

    One unexpected tool: listening to familiar GraphicAudio productions I’ve heard during training in the hour before race start. The familiarity calms my nervous system while the engaging content prevents anxiety rumination. It’s like a security blanket for my ADHD brain.

    Using Hyperfocus Strategically

    In races, I intentionally trigger hyperfocus during challenging sections. Miles 60-80 are where hyperfocus becomes a weapon – I can lock into the rhythm of moving forward with intensity that lets me pass dozens of runners who are mentally faltering.

    The key is not fighting the hyperfocus but channeling it. When I feel my brain clicking into that locked-on state around mile 50-60, I let it happen rather than worrying about “pacing strategy” or “saving energy.” My ADHD hyperfocus has carried me through sections where calculated pacing would have led to walking.

    Managing ADHD Medication During Ultras

    Many ADHD runners take stimulant medications (Adderall, Ritalin, Vyvanse). These interact with ultra running in complex ways:

    Benefits: Better executive function for managing fueling schedules, improved focus during night sections, enhanced motivation during low points

    Risks: Appetite suppression (problematic when you need to eat 200-300 calories/hour), increased heart rate and blood pressure, potential dehydration, sleep disruption if racing through night

    I experimented extensively and found my sweet spot: taking my normal morning dose pre-race, then no additional medication. The initial dose provides 4-6 hours of ADHD management during early race miles when logistics are complex, but wears off before night running when stimulant side effects would be problematic. Every ADHD runner needs to experiment with their prescribing physician to find what works.

    The ADHD Ultra Running Community

    One unexpected benefit of ultra running: discovering how many elite and mid-pack runners also have ADHD. The neurotype is overrepresented in ultra running compared to general population. We recognize each other through shared experiences: the hyperfocus in races, the training consistency struggles, the way we use running for emotional regulation.

    This community has taught me that my ADHD isn’t a weakness to overcome – it’s a different operating system that, when understood and leveraged properly, provides genuine advantages in ultra running. The same brain that makes scheduling challenging and paperwork excruciating also lets me run for 24+ hours with focus that neurotypical runners find remarkable.

    Final Thoughts on ADHD and Ultra Running

    If you’re an ADHD runner struggling with traditional training approaches, you’re not broken. Your brain works differently, and ultra running happens to align remarkably well with ADHD neurology – if you adapt your approach.

    Embrace training flexibility over rigid structure. Use audio content strategically to manage understimulation. Leverage your hyperfocus as a superpower during races. Stop fighting your ADHD and start working with it.

    The sport rewards exactly the traits our neurotype provides: ability to maintain focus during extended efforts, tolerance for discomfort and novelty, and a reward system that thrives on variable, unpredictable challenges. Ultra running isn’t despite my ADHD – it’s partly because of it.